CLLS
Price
$3.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 11, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
379.18M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDGL
Price
$497.03
Change
-$13.01 (-2.55%)
Updated
May 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.46B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLS vs MDGL

Header iconCLLS vs MDGL Comparison
Open Charts CLLS vs MDGLBanner chart's image
CLLS vs MDGL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) vs. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CLLS, a clinical-stage gene-editing biotech, has shown strong one-year gains of approximately 197%, driven by recent market momentum, but remains pre-revenue with higher volatility.
  • MDGL, focused on MASH treatments, boasts a marketed product Rezdiffra with $958 million in 2025 sales, supporting a $12 billion market cap and steadier recent performance.
  • Recent weeks have seen CLLS up over 24% monthly amid biotech sector interest, while MDGL gained about 19%, reflecting commercial traction.
  • MDGL offers revenue stability and pipeline expansion, contrasting CLLS's higher-risk, high-reward clinical pipeline in immuno-oncology.
  • Year-to-date, CLLS edges positive returns around 11%, versus MDGL's slight decline, highlighting divergent risk profiles.
  • Both stocks exemplify biotech contrasts: speculative gene-editing versus commercialized metabolic therapies.

Introduction

This comparison examines CLLS and MDGL, two biotechs navigating distinct paths in gene editing and metabolic liver disease treatments. Traders seeking momentum plays may eye CLLS's volatility, while long-term investors might favor MDGL's revenue generation. In the current market, with biotech sentiment buoyed by clinical data and commercial launches, this analysis highlights relative performance, sector exposure, and positioning to aid informed stock comparison decisions.

CLLS Overview and Recent Performance

Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) is a clinical-stage biotechnology company headquartered in Paris, specializing in gene-editing technologies for allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies in immuno-oncology and other indications. Its pipeline includes candidates like BALLI-01 for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and NatHaLi-01 for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL).

Recent market activity has propelled CLLS shares higher, with approximately 24% gains over the past month and over 27% in the last five days, trading around $4.28 amid elevated volume near 46,000 shares daily. Year-to-date returns stand positive at about 11%, building on a remarkable 197% one-year surge from lows near $1.33 to highs of $5.48. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing clinical advancements and broader biotech momentum, though the company reports net losses and remains pre-revenue, with a market cap around $440 million. Volatility persists, reflected in a beta over 2.7, as investors weigh pipeline progress against funding needs.

MDGL Overview and Recent Performance

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) is a biopharmaceutical firm targeting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), formerly NASH, with its lead product Rezdiffra (resmetirom), the first FDA-approved therapy for non-cirrhotic MASH with moderate to advanced fibrosis.

In recent market activity, MDGL shares have risen about 19% over the past month, trading near $525 with average daily volume around 370,000 shares. The stock delivered 66% one-year returns, ranging from $265 to $615, though year-to-date it's slightly down amid sector pressures. Rezdiffra drove blockbuster-level 2025 net sales of $958 million, up significantly from prior periods, fueling a $12 billion market cap. Positive sentiment stems from strong adoption, pipeline expansions like siRNA licensing, and robust revenue growth, offsetting ongoing losses while providing commercial validation in a high-unmet-need area.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from 351 total bots, engineered to outperform across growth sectors with real-time signals for copy trading in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like AI/ML, technical analysis, and multi-agent approaches on timeframes from 5min to 60min, trading sets of tickers from 3 to 25 across industries. Top performers boast annualized returns up to +137%, win rates to 87%, and profit factors exceeding 6, with equity growth examples like $48,783 on $100,000 balances. Only the most suitable for current conditions earn a spot here, highlighting varying styles, performances, and risk controls. Explore Tickeron’s AI trading bots to leverage these insights in your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CLLS and MDGL operate in biotech but diverge sharply: CLLS pursues high-risk gene-editing for oncology CAR-Ts (off-the-shelf allogeneic therapies), while MDGL targets MASH with a commercialized oral THR-β agonist. Growth drivers contrast—CLLS relies on clinical milestones amid net losses of $37 million annually, versus MDGL’s $958 million Rezdiffra sales enabling pipeline bolstering.

Recent momentum favors CLLS (24% monthly vs. 19%), but MDGL shows stability with higher liquidity. Risk factors include CLLS’s trial delays and dilution potential (beta 2.7), against MDGL’s competition in MASH. Sector exposure pits immuno-oncology volatility against metabolic disease commercialization, with market sentiment leaning toward revenue-proven plays amid biotech funding tightness.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors MDGL due to its trend consistency via Rezdiffra sales growth, commercial stability, and expanding catalysts like licensing deals, positioning it strongly relative to CLLS’s speculative clinical momentum. While CLLS offers upside from pipeline successes, MDGL’s revenue base suggests higher probability of sustained outperformance in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLLS vs. MDGL commentary
May 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLS is a Hold and MDGL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CLLS: $3.85 vs. MDGL: $497.03)
Brand notoriety: CLLS and MDGL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLS: 92% vs. MDGL: 96%
Market capitalization -- CLLS: $379.18M vs. MDGL: $11.46B
CLLS [@Biotechnology] is valued at $379.18M. MDGL’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $11.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $110.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDGL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDGL is a better buy in the long-term than CLLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDGL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MDGL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLS is a better buy in the short-term than MDGL.

Price Growth

CLLS (@Biotechnology) experienced а -2.53% price change this week, while MDGL (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +5.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLS is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.

MDGL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+5.02% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDGL($11.5B) has a higher market cap than CLLS($379M). MDGL YTD gains are higher at: -14.650 vs. CLLS (-20.455). CLLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.07M vs. MDGL (-281.09M). MDGL has more cash in the bank: 813M vs. CLLS (190M). CLLS has less debt than MDGL: CLLS (92.8M) vs MDGL (347M). MDGL has higher revenues than CLLS: MDGL (1.13B) vs CLLS (75.3M).
CLLSMDGLCLLS / MDGL
Capitalization379M11.5B3%
EBITDA-6.07M-281.09M2%
Gain YTD-20.455-14.650140%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue75.3M1.13B7%
Total Cash190M813M23%
Total Debt92.8M347M27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLS vs MDGL: Fundamental Ratings
CLLS
MDGL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10023
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLLS's Valuation (36) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MDGL (65) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that CLLS’s stock grew similarly to MDGL’s over the last 12 months.

MDGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that MDGL’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLLS's SMR Rating (96) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MDGL (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that CLLS’s stock grew similarly to MDGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLLS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MDGL (47) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that CLLS’s stock grew similarly to MDGL’s over the last 12 months.

CLLS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as MDGL (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that CLLS’s stock grew similarly to MDGL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLSMDGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDGL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCINX15.940.16
+1.01%
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Indvl Inv
INDCX14.650.06
+0.41%
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Growth C
PMDIX21.940.08
+0.37%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc Inst
FSRKX9.630.03
+0.31%
Fidelity Strategic Real Return K6
TWHIX20.85-0.24
-1.14%
American Century Heritage Inv