Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLMPX vs FCQAX
CLMPX vs FCQAX Comparison
Open Charts CLMPX vs FCQAX
CLMPX vs FCQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 300.93M to 3.28B. FCQAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 3.28B. The lowest valued company is CLMPX at 300.93M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1%. FCQAX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while CLMPX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
CLMPX vs. FCQAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMPX is a Hold and FCQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCQAX has more cash in the bank: 3.28B vs. CLMPX (301M). FCQAX pays higher dividends than CLMPX: FCQAX (4.25) vs CLMPX (3.59). CLMPX was incepted earlier than FCQAX: CLMPX (40 years) vs FCQAX (8 years). FCQAX (0.81) and CLMPX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . CLMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCQAX (13.89). FCQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLMPX (3%) vs CLMPX (3%). FCQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLMPX: FCQAX (1000) vs CLMPX (2000). FCQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. CLMPX (4.48). CLMPX return over 5 years is better than : -2.86 vs. FCQAX (-3.76).
| CLMPX | FCQAX | CLMPX / FCQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.81 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.248 | 0.181 | -137% |
| Front Load | 3% | 4% | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301M | 3.28B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 4.25 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 4.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 12.61 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.86 | -3.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement