Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLOD vs SMH
CLOD vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CLOD vs SMH
CLOD vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLOD vs. SMH commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLOD is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.8B vs. CLOD (2.53M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than CLOD: SMH (69.830) vs CLOD (-7.507). CLOD was incepted earlier than SMH: CLOD (3 years) vs SMH (15 years). CLOD (0.35) and SMH (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . CLOD has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| CLOD | SMH | CLOD / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -7.507 | 69.830 | -11% |
| Net Assets | 2.53M | 68.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 12.00 | 125% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.17 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLOD | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOD and FFIV have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOD and FFIV's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOD | 100% | N/A | ||
| FFIV - CLOD | 16% Poorly correlated | -3.78% | ||
| DDOG - CLOD | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| CRWD - CLOD | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| GOOGL - CLOD | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| FTNT - CLOD | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -10.19% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -11.51% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -7.35% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -4.00% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 79% Closely correlated | -3.27% | ||
More | ||||