Celestica Inc. (CLS) and TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) represent two distinct players within the electronic components industry, making their comparison relevant for investors seeking exposure to manufacturing and technology supply chains. Traders focused on relative performance, sector momentum, and risk-adjusted positioning often examine such pairs to identify trade-offs between scale, growth trajectories, and market sensitivity. This analysis highlights observable differences in business models, recent price behavior, and positioning within current market conditions without favoring either security.
Celestica Inc. (CLS) provides electronics manufacturing services, including design, supply chain management, and after-market support across multiple end markets. In recent market activity, the stock has shown measured movements amid broader sector dynamics, with year-to-date gains remaining modest relative to peers. Recent weeks have reflected steady sentiment supported by its diversified revenue streams and larger operational scale, as evidenced by higher overall revenues and EBITDA compared to smaller competitors. Earnings expectations around late July 2026 have contributed to ongoing attention, while the company maintains a market capitalization significantly above many sector counterparts.
TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) specializes in the production of printed circuit boards and related interconnect solutions, with notable exposure to aerospace, defense, and high-technology applications. Recent market activity has featured pronounced gains on a year-to-date and trailing twelve-month basis, driven by robust demand and operational records such as strong first-quarter 2026 results. Developments including upcoming second-quarter earnings in early August 2026 and participation in industry events have influenced sentiment, alongside expansion initiatives in key regions. The stock has experienced higher volatility in recent weeks relative to broader indices, consistent with its concentrated end-market focus.
Tickeron maintains a curated section known as Trending AI Robots, which showcases select AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that execute strategies across thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating superior adaptability, consistent performance metrics, and alignment with current trends are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with many reporting win rates between 55% and 75% alongside varying risk parameters and return histories. Readers interested in exploring these automated approaches may visit the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot specifications and historical data.
In business model terms, Celestica Inc. (CLS) emphasizes comprehensive electronics manufacturing services with global scale, whereas TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) concentrates on specialized printed circuit board production for mission-critical sectors. Growth drivers differ notably: TTMI benefits from aerospace and defense tailwinds that have supported outsized recent returns, while CLS draws strength from diversified end markets and higher absolute revenue figures. Recent momentum has favored TTMI on multi-month horizons, though CLS displays comparatively lower price volatility during the latest trading periods. Risk factors include TTMI’s greater sensitivity to defense spending cycles and CLS’s exposure to broader supply chain fluctuations. Sector exposure remains shared within electronic components, yet market sentiment currently reflects TTMI’s stronger relative price appreciation against CLS’s emphasis on operational stability and larger market capitalization.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) due to its pronounced recent momentum and sector-specific catalysts. Celestica Inc. (CLS) remains competitive through scale and stability metrics. This assessment reflects pattern recognition from available data and carries no guarantee of future outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +10.52% price change this week, while TTMI (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.85%.
CLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
TTMI is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| CLS | TTMI | CLS / TTMI | |
| Capitalization | 43.9B | 14.6B | 301% |
| EBITDA | 1.36B | 422M | 322% |
| Gain YTD | 17.598 | 101.275 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.40 | 62.56 | 58% |
| Revenue | 13.8B | 3.1B | 445% |
| Total Cash | 536M | 410M | 131% |
| Total Debt | 810M | 1.05B | 77% |
CLS | TTMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLS's Valuation (61) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (63). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (48). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's SMR Rating (20) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTMI (67). This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTMI’s over the last 12 months.
TTMI's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (48). This means that TTMI’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.
TTMI's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (78). This means that TTMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.
| CLS | TTMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 17 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS | 100% | +2.41% | ||
| FN - CLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| TTMI - CLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FLEX - CLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| GLW - CLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.32% | ||
| BHE - CLS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTMI has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTMI jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTMI | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| BHE - TTMI | 70% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| CLS - TTMI | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| LFUS - TTMI | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| PLXS - TTMI | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| FLEX - TTMI | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||