Advertisement
CLSK vs ELF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and ELF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ELF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ELF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.01% price change this week, while ELF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +6.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
ELF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Household/Personal Care (-1.71% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CLSK | ELF | CLSK / ELF | |
| Capitalization | 4.78B | 10.7B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 60.4M | 173M | 35% |
| Gain YTD | 0.977 | -0.231 | -423% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 84.94 | - |
| Revenue | 216M | 890M | 24% |
| Total Cash | 176M | 72.7M | 242% |
| Total Debt | 15.2M | 294M | 5% |
CLSK | ELF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ELF (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ELF’s over the last 12 months.
ELF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLSK (80) in the null industry. This means that ELF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
ELF's SMR Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (91) in the null industry. This means that ELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
ELF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CLSK (62) in the null industry. This means that ELF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as ELF (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ELF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | ELF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
ELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELF has been loosely correlated with COTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELF jumps, then COTY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELF | 100% | -2.55% | ||
| COTY - ELF | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.96% | ||
| IPAR - ELF | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| EL - ELF | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.83% | ||
| SPB - ELF | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| EPC - ELF | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.76% | ||
More | ||||