CLSK
Price
$9.35
Change
+$0.12 (+1.30%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.43B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSLY
Price
$25.07
Change
+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.97B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs FSLY

CLSK vs FSLY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. FSLY commentary
Oct 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and FSLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CLSK with price predictions
Oct 14, 2026

Momentum Indicator for CLSK turns negative, indicating new downward trend

CLSK saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 01, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 75 of the 83 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CLSK turned negative on September 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 40 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

CLSK moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for CLSK crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The 50-day moving average for CLSK moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLSK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +4.63% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLSK advanced for three days, in 233 of 265 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

CLSK may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 153 of 172 cases where CLSK Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 89%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 18 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CLSK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.500) is normal, around the industry mean (4.320). P/E Ratio (7.375) is within average values for comparable stocks, (30.932). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.397) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CLSK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FSLY with price predictions
Oct 14, 2026

FSLY sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

FSLY saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 14, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 44 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 44 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FSLY as a result. In 82 of 93 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

FSLY moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FSLY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

FSLY broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

The 10-day moving average for FSLY crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 14 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +15.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FSLY advanced for three days, in 227 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 167 of 209 cases where FSLY Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 80%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FSLY’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.006) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.222) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FSLY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs FSLY: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
FSLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5984
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1890

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSLY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (85). This means that FSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (100). This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (98). This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (84). This means that FSLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FSLY (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKFSLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.23 vs. FSLY: $25.00)
Brand notoriety: CLSK: Not notable vs. FSLY: Notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while FSLY is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 148% vs. FSLY: 88%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.43B vs. FSLY: $3.97B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.43B. FSLY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $590 to $304.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $39 to $244.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FSLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSLY is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than FSLY.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -19.92% price change this week, while FSLY (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2026.

FSLY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.85% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-2.45% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWV16.420.50
+3.17%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV)
DSTL66.220.34
+0.52%
Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL)
IGHG77.45-0.16
-0.21%
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG)
ESGG236.93-1.81
-0.76%
Northern Trust STOXX Global ESG Select ETF (ESGG)
MARZ37.38-0.36
-0.94%
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ)

FSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLY has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLY jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSLY
1D Price
Change %
FSLY100%
-7.72%
COIN - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.90%
CLSK - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
-9.11%
RIOT - FSLY
58%
Loosely correlated
-9.42%
RAMP - FSLY
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
COMP - FSLY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More