Advertisement
HUBS vs MDB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. MongoDB (MDB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HubSpot (HUBS) delivered Q1 2026 revenue of $881 million, exceeding expectations with 23.4% year-over-year growth, yet shares declined sharply following the report amid broader valuation pressure.
- MongoDB (MDB) has shown stronger recent momentum, with shares rising approximately 21% over the past month as of late May 2026, supported by AI-related demand for its database platform.
- HubSpot (HUBS) trades significantly below its 52-week high, reflecting a year-to-date decline near 50%, while MongoDB (MDB) has posted positive year-to-date returns around 22%.
- Both companies operate in high-growth software segments tied to digital transformation and artificial intelligence, though their business models differ—customer relationship management for HubSpot (HUBS) versus database infrastructure for MongoDB (MDB).
- Analyst sentiment has turned more cautious on HubSpot (HUBS) with multiple price target reductions in May 2026, whereas MongoDB (MDB) benefits from sustained interest in cloud database solutions.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between established growth at HubSpot (HUBS) and accelerating adoption trends at MongoDB (MDB) in the current market environment.
Introduction
HubSpot (HUBS) and MongoDB (MDB) represent two distinct yet complementary areas within the technology sector, making their comparison relevant for investors evaluating software platforms exposed to artificial intelligence and cloud adoption. HubSpot (HUBS) provides customer relationship management and marketing automation tools, while MongoDB (MDB) offers a leading NoSQL database platform with strong cloud capabilities. Traders and portfolio managers focused on growth-oriented technology equities may find this head-to-head analysis useful for assessing relative momentum, valuation dynamics, and sector positioning amid evolving market conditions. The comparison draws on observable price behavior and recent corporate developments to highlight key contrasts without forward-looking speculation.
HubSpot (HUBS) Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) develops an integrated customer platform that combines marketing, sales, and service software, serving businesses seeking to manage customer interactions through data-driven tools. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced notable downward pressure, trading near levels not seen since 2019 despite reporting record revenues and advancements in artificial intelligence features. Following its Q1 2026 earnings release in early May, shares fell approximately 12% in immediate trading, even as revenue reached $881 million and surpassed analyst estimates. Broader sentiment has been influenced by multiple analyst downgrades and reduced price targets during May 2026, contributing to a year-to-date decline of roughly 50%. The company continues to emphasize AI-driven enhancements to its platform, which has supported steady customer growth amid competitive pressures in the customer experience software space.
MongoDB (MDB) Overview and Recent Performance
MongoDB (MDB) provides a flexible document-oriented database platform, including its cloud-based MongoDB Atlas service, which supports modern application development and data management needs. Recent market activity has featured positive momentum for the shares, with gains of about 21% over the past month as of late May 2026. This performance aligns with ongoing interest in artificial intelligence workloads that benefit from scalable, cloud-native database infrastructure. Earlier fiscal results demonstrated revenue growth exceeding 20% year-over-year, with particular strength in subscription and Atlas segments. Market positioning has remained constructive relative to peers, supported by expanding customer adoption and operational improvements, though the stock continues to trade within a range influenced by broader technology sector dynamics.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots exhibit diverse statistics, including ranges of historical returns, win rates, and risk profiles tailored to different trading styles such as trend following or mean reversion. This curated approach allows users to explore options aligned with current market environments. For additional details on these AI-powered tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HubSpot (HUBS) and MongoDB (MDB) both operate in the software-as-a-service space with exposure to digital transformation trends, yet they differ in core business models and growth drivers. HubSpot (HUBS) focuses on front-office customer engagement platforms, benefiting from recurring subscription revenue tied to marketing and sales efficiency. MongoDB (MDB) emphasizes backend database infrastructure, with particular strength in cloud deployments that support AI and analytics applications. Recent momentum favors MongoDB (MDB), which has posted stronger short-term price gains amid sustained demand for its technology, while HubSpot (HUBS) has faced sharper corrections following earnings despite solid fundamentals. Risk factors include valuation compression for HubSpot (HUBS) after significant prior run-ups and execution dependencies on cloud migration for MongoDB (MDB). Sector exposure overlaps in enterprise technology spending, though market sentiment currently reflects greater caution toward established customer platforms versus database enablers of emerging workloads. Trade-offs center on HubSpot (HUBS)’s scale and brand recognition versus MongoDB (MDB)’s positioning in high-growth data infrastructure.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency and relative market positioning, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to MongoDB (MDB) over HubSpot (HUBS). MongoDB (MDB) has demonstrated more stable upward price movement in recent weeks alongside continued interest in its core offerings, whereas HubSpot (HUBS) has encountered greater volatility and downward pressure despite underlying business resilience. This assessment remains probabilistic and reflects current data patterns rather than definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and MDB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -11.60% price change this week, while MDB (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HUBS | MDB | HUBS / MDB | |
| Capitalization | 9.62B | 27.6B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 267M | 26.8M | 996% |
| Gain YTD | -53.157 | -18.321 | 290% |
| P/E Ratio | 98.94 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.3B | 2.6B | 127% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 2.43B | 70% |
| Total Debt | 247M | 30.4M | 813% |
HUBS | MDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDB's Valuation (52) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | MDB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 13 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| S - HUBS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
MDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| COIN - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| CLSK - MDB | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| HUBS - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| RIOT - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
More | ||||