Advertisement
HUBS vs MDB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HubSpot (HUBS) vs. MongoDB (MDB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HUBS has experienced significant price declines over the past year, trading well below its 52-week high amid broader software sector pressures.
- MDB has shown stronger relative performance recently, with notable gains in August 2026 supported by database demand and AI-related workloads.
- Both companies operate in the technology sector with exposure to cloud and growth-oriented software markets, though HUBS focuses on customer relationship management platforms while MDB specializes in database infrastructure.
- Recent market activity highlights contrasting momentum, with MDB demonstrating greater resilience compared to HUBS in the trailing period.
- Valuation metrics and growth drivers differ, with HUBS emphasizing subscription expansion and MDB benefiting from enterprise data platform adoption.
- Sector sentiment remains influenced by AI developments, creating varied positioning for the two stocks in current market conditions.
Introduction
This comparison examines HUBS and MDB, two technology stocks frequently monitored by investors seeking exposure to software and cloud infrastructure. HubSpot provides a customer platform for marketing, sales, and service, while MongoDB offers a document-oriented database solution widely used in modern applications. The analysis targets traders and investors evaluating relative performance, business models, and positioning amid evolving market dynamics. It highlights observable trends in price behavior and sector influences over recent weeks without forward-looking assumptions.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot delivers a cloud-based platform that integrates marketing, sales, and customer service tools. The company has focused on subscription revenue growth and AI-enhanced features within its growth platform. In recent market activity, the stock traded near $260, reflecting volatility following earlier declines. Performance in recent weeks showed recovery attempts after reaching lower levels in mid-2026, influenced by quarterly results and broader software sector movements. Sentiment has been shaped by customer acquisition trends and adoption of platform capabilities, contributing to mixed price action relative to wider market benchmarks.
MDB Overview and Recent Performance
MongoDB provides a scalable database platform supporting diverse data workloads, including those related to artificial intelligence applications. The business emphasizes its Atlas cloud service for enterprise and developer use cases. Recent performance demonstrated upward movement, with the stock closing near $447 in late August after gains in the preceding sessions. Activity over recent weeks benefited from positive momentum in database demand, contrasting with some peers in the software space. Market positioning has been supported by enterprise interest in flexible data infrastructure, leading to relatively stable sentiment compared to more volatile names.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section highlighting top-performing AI trading bots suited to prevailing market conditions. While the platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots capable of handling thousands of tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, only those demonstrating strong alignment with current environments appear in the Trending AI Robots listing. Available bots encompass diverse approaches, including different risk parameters, historical statistics, and ticker selections. This section provides traders with accessible insights into automated strategies. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for additional details on active options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two stocks differ markedly in business focus: HUBS centers on front-office customer engagement software, whereas MDB supplies backend database technology essential for data-intensive applications. Growth drivers for HUBS include platform upsells and AI tool integration, while MDB draws from expanding use of document databases in cloud and AI environments. Recent momentum favors MDB based on price recovery patterns, in contrast to the more pronounced drawdown observed in HUBS. Risk factors include execution on subscription metrics for one and infrastructure competition for the other. Both carry technology sector exposure, yet MDB exhibits higher beta characteristics in observed trading. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with relative performance underscoring trade-offs between customer platform stability and database growth potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent sessions and relative positioning within the software sector, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference toward MDB in the current environment. This assessment draws from stronger recent price behavior and alignment with data platform catalysts, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing market variables and company-specific developments. The evaluation emphasizes stability metrics and momentum indicators rather than absolute projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a StrongBuy and MDB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MDB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MDB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while MDB (@Computer Communications) price change was -17.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Dec 07, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.96% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HUBS | MDB | HUBS / MDB | |
| Capitalization | 12.3B | 29.7B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 333M | 115M | 290% |
| Gain YTD | -38.301 | -12.140 | 315% |
| P/E Ratio | 88.11 | 519.35 | 17% |
| Revenue | 3.45B | 2.78B | 124% |
| Total Cash | 1.34B | 2.41B | 55% |
| Total Debt | 237M | 28.6M | 829% |
HUBS | MDB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (88) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | MDB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -2.95% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -12.69% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
MDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDB | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | -5.41% | ||
| COIN - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.18% | ||
| CLSK - MDB | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| HUBS - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| RIOT - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
More | ||||