CLSK
Price
$13.46
Change
+$2.01 (+17.57%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.15B
90 days until earnings call
NTES
Price
$152.88
Change
-$6.46 (-4.05%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.26B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs NTES

Header iconCLSK vs NTES Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs NTESBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$13.46
Change+$2.01 (+17.57%)
Volume$464.1K
Capitalization3.15B
NetEase
Price$152.88
Change-$6.46 (-4.05%)
Volume$11.81K
Capitalization100.26B
CLSK vs NTES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. NTES commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and NTES is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $11.44 vs. NTES: $159.34)
Brand notoriety: CLSK: Not notable vs. NTES: Notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while NTES is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 133% vs. NTES: 101%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $3.15B vs. NTES: $100.26B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.15B. NTES’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $100.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $13.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTES’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTES is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTES’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NTES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTES is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +14.01% price change this week, while NTES (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +9.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.91%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

NTES is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (+0.80% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTES($100B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($3.15B). NTES has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: NTES (21.32) vs CLSK (13.30). NTES YTD gains are higher at: 82.508 vs. CLSK (24.159). NTES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.6B vs. CLSK (626M). NTES has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. CLSK (916M). CLSK has less debt than NTES: CLSK (820M) vs NTES (11.3B). NTES has higher revenues than CLSK: NTES (110B) vs CLSK (632M).
CLSKNTESCLSK / NTES
Capitalization3.15B100B3%
EBITDA626M36.6B2%
Gain YTD24.15982.50829%
P/E Ratio13.3021.3262%
Revenue632M110B1%
Total Cash916M147B1%
Total Debt820M11.3B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs NTES: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
NTES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1726
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
5239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTES's Valuation (40) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (72) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (100) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

NTES's SMR Rating (39) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (52) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

NTES's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (41) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

NTES's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (33) in the null industry. This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKNTES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NTES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PVI24.860.02
+0.09%
Invesco Floating Rate MunicipalIncomeETF
HBMBF219.20N/A
N/A
HBM Bioventures AG
AVGV70.14-0.07
-0.10%
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
QJUN30.82-0.08
-0.26%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - Jun
QLD132.51-0.57
-0.43%
ProShares Ultra QQQ

NTES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTES
1D Price
Change %
NTES100%
+1.44%
BILI - NTES
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
YMM - NTES
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
NETTF - NTES
42%
Loosely correlated
+11.15%
RIOT - NTES
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
CLSK - NTES
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
More