CLST
Price
$12.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 4, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.99M
COFS
Price
$28.92
Change
+$0.21 (+0.73%)
Updated
Aug 4, 04:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
206.57M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs COFS

Header iconCLST vs COFS Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs COFSBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$12.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization53.99M
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$28.92
Change+$0.21 (+0.73%)
Volume$100
Capitalization206.57M
CLST vs COFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. COFS commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a Hold and COFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $12.40 vs. COFS: $28.71)
Brand notoriety: CLST and COFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 1% vs. COFS: 58%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $53.99M vs. COFS: $206.57M
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.99M. COFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $206.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCOFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLST is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.16% price change this week, while COFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLST is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

COFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COFS($207M) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than COFS: CLST (84.57) vs COFS (9.50). CLST YTD gains are higher at: 5.353 vs. COFS (-17.866). COFS has higher revenues than CLST: COFS (80.8M) vs CLST (9.14M).
CLSTCOFSCLST / COFS
Capitalization54M207M26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.353-17.866-30%
P/E Ratio84.579.50890%
Revenue9.14M80.8M11%
Total CashN/A144M-
Total DebtN/A236M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs COFS: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
COFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1260
SMR RATING
1..100
8447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
478
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLST's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as COFS (56). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COFS (60). This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (84). This means that COFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as COFS (60). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (47). This means that COFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTCOFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VKSC1.66N/A
N/A
Viskase Companies, Inc.
HAWLM14.75N/A
N/A
Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.
OLKR0.14N/A
N/A
OpenLocker Holdings Inc.
RDEIY9.54-0.09
-0.93%
Redeia Corporacion SA
PTXKY3.03-0.46
-13.18%
PT XLSMART Telecom Sejahtera Tbk

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with COLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then COLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
-2.35%
COLB - COFS
78%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
HBNC - COFS
77%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
ASB - COFS
75%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
ABCB - COFS
74%
Closely correlated
-3.57%
VLY - COFS
74%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
More