COFS
Price
$30.50
Change
-$1.10 (-3.48%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
473.21M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HBNC
Price
$18.18
Change
-$0.47 (-2.52%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
957.3M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs HBNC

Header iconCOFS vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs HBNCBanner chart's image
COFS vs HBNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. HBNC commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Hold and HBNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (COFS: $31.53 vs. HBNC: $18.65)
Brand notoriety: COFS and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 160% vs. HBNC: 93%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $473.21M vs. HBNC: $957.3M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $473.21M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $957.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the long-term than HBNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COFS and HBNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.84% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($957M) has a higher market cap than COFS($473M). HBNC has higher P/E ratio than COFS: HBNC (13.73) vs COFS (7.25). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 12.081 vs. COFS (7.948). COFS has more cash in the bank: 97.9M vs. HBNC (66.8M). COFS has less debt than HBNC: COFS (234M) vs HBNC (316M). COFS has higher revenues than HBNC: COFS (173M) vs HBNC (-31.31M).
COFSHBNCCOFS / HBNC
Capitalization473M957M49%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.94812.08166%
P/E Ratio7.2513.7353%
Revenue173M-31.31M-553%
Total Cash97.9M66.8M147%
Total Debt234M316M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4979
SMR RATING
1..100
5395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9897
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COFS's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HBNC (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (51) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (98) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSHBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JTUCX18.20N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Small Company C
DHLYX32.38N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Large Cap Y
GGSOX18.33N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak Global Stalwarts Investor
GQGPX18.81N/A
N/A
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Inv
HGXIX19.01N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact I