Ad is loading...
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
Columbia International Div Inc Inst3
Price$19.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.96M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.83B
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a StrongBuy and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.83B vs. CLSYX (532M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (7.88) vs CLSYX (2.63). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (16 years) vs HFQRX (9 years). CLSYX (0.84) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CLSYX (39.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.48 vs. CLSYX (0.74). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 85.14 vs. CLSYX (51.50).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.70 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.70 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.756 | 8.306 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 5.83B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 7.88 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.74 | 12.48 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.52 | 20.29 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.50 | 85.14 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...