Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
Columbia International Div Inc Inst3
Price$22.25
Change-$0.10 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.43M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. CLSYX (580M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (7.24) vs CLSYX (2.89). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CLSYX (0.84) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CLSYX (39.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. CLSYX (15.61). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 59.64 vs. CLSYX (34.85).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.70 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.70 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.086 | 22.066 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 6.7B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 7.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 20.72 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 45.56 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.85 | 59.64 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers