Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
Columbia International Div Inc Inst3
Price$22.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.8M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. CLSYX (598M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (7.29) vs CLSYX (2.92). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CLSYX (0.84) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CLSYX (39.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. CLSYX (13.26). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 74.11 vs. CLSYX (48.09).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.70 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.70 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.785 | 23.469 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598M | 6.59B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 7.29 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.26 | 18.67 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.98 | 63.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.09 | 74.11 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers