Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSYX vs HFQRX
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CLSYX vs HFQRX
Columbia International Div Inc Inst3
Price$22.01
Change-$0.15 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets582.49M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.03
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
CLSYX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSYX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSYX is a Buy and HFQRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. CLSYX (582M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CLSYX: HFQRX (7.21) vs CLSYX (2.44). CLSYX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CLSYX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CLSYX (0.84) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CLSYX (39.00). CLSYX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.98 vs. CLSYX (9.31). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 77.03 vs. CLSYX (47.03).
| CLSYX | HFQRX | CLSYX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.70 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.70 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.040 | 21.986 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 582M | 6.62B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 7.21 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 17.98 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.77 | 67.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.03 | 77.03 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement