CLW
Price
$22.01
Change
+$0.09 (+0.41%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
354.45M
58 days until earnings call
MAGN
Price
$12.01
Change
+$0.07 (+0.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
427.56M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLW vs MAGN

Header iconCLW vs MAGN Comparison
Open Charts CLW vs MAGNBanner chart's image
Clearwater Paper
Price$22.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
Volume$179.67K
Capitalization354.45M
Magnera
Price$12.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.59%)
Volume$755.99K
Capitalization427.56M
CLW vs MAGN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLW vs. MAGN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLW is a StrongBuy and MAGN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLW: $22.01 vs. MAGN: $12.01)
Brand notoriety: CLW and MAGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLW: 81% vs. MAGN: 118%
Market capitalization -- CLW: $354.45M vs. MAGN: $427.56M
CLW [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $354.45M. MAGN’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $427.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAGN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLW and MAGN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAGN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAGN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLW is a better buy in the short-term than MAGN.

Price Growth

CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while MAGN (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLW is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

MAGN is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAGN($428M) has a higher market cap than CLW($354M). CLW YTD gains are higher at: -26.067 vs. MAGN (-33.902). MAGN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 67.1M vs. CLW (41.3M). MAGN has more cash in the bank: 276M vs. CLW (46.7M). CLW has less debt than MAGN: CLW (341M) vs MAGN (2.05B). CLW has higher revenues than MAGN: CLW (1.55B) vs MAGN (1.31B).
CLWMAGNCLW / MAGN
Capitalization354M428M83%
EBITDA41.3M67.1M62%
Gain YTD-26.067-33.90277%
P/E Ratio1454.00N/A-
Revenue1.55B1.31B118%
Total Cash46.7M276M17%
Total Debt341M2.05B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLW vs MAGN: Fundamental Ratings
CLW
MAGN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
766
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8285
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAGN's Valuation (5) in the Pulp And Paper industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLW (97). This means that MAGN’s stock grew significantly faster than CLW’s over the last 12 months.

MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (100). This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's SMR Rating (35) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAGN (96). This means that CLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's Price Growth Rating (82) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (85). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

CLW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (10). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLWMAGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGTX10.27N/A
N/A
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate S
KSOCX144.42N/A
N/A
Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Adv C
FIKIX48.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z
MSBQX12.03N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley American Resilience R6
JCONX29.71N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian I

CLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLW has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLW jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLW
1D Price
Change %
CLW100%
+0.41%
SLVM - CLW
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
MERC - CLW
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
MAGN - CLW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
MONDY - CLW
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
SUZ - CLW
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

MAGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAGN and MATV have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAGN and MATV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAGN
1D Price
Change %
MAGN100%
+0.59%
MATV - MAGN
33%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
SLVM - MAGN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
SUZ - MAGN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
MONDY - MAGN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
MERC - MAGN
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
More