Advertisement
CLW vs MAGN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLW is a Hold and MAGN is a Buy.
CLW's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for CLW entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 174 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 134 of the 174 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 77%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CLW turned negative on October 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CLW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CLW's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 30 of 37 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 60 cases where CLW's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CLW as a result. In 70 of 96 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +5.16% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CLW advanced for three days, in 179 of 279 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
CLW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 22 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating for company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), which means the company is slightly undervalued. The valuation of the company is based on a proprietary formula which takes into account a set of fundamentals and gives us an estimate of the price per share for the company. We then compare this estimate with the current price per share. As a result, this company is rated as undervalued in the industry. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.269) is normal, around the industry mean (0.397). P/E Ratio (-4.337) is within average values for comparable stocks, (3.517). CLW's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.010) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.185). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.587) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.223) is also within normal values, averaging (0.381).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CLW’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CLW’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
Momentum Indicator for MAGN turns positive, indicating new upward trend
MAGN saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 22, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 66 of the 83 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 80%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MAGN just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where MAGN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
MAGN moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MAGN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 03, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +5.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MAGN advanced for three days, in 186 of 264 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for MAGN moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 17 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 16 of the 17 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The 50-day moving average for MAGN moved below the 200-day moving average on October 09, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MAGN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
MAGN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MAGN entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 20 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.388) is normal, around the industry mean (21.731). P/E Ratio (-0.646) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.288). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.120) is also within normal values, averaging (1.518). Dividend Yield (0.074) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.129) is also within normal values, averaging (1.902).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 33 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MAGN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MAGN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 86, placing this stock worse than average.
CLW | MAGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAGN's Valuation (20) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (26). This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.
MAGN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CLW (100). This means that MAGN’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's SMR Rating (92) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (97). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.
MAGN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLW (81). This means that MAGN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as MAGN (33). This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to MAGN’s over the last 12 months.
| CLW | MAGN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 15 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MAGN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MAGN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAGN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MAGN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +3.66% price change this week, while MAGN (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +9.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -8.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.20%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +6.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLW is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2027.
MAGN is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-8.59% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
@Household/Personal Care (+6.60% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
CLW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLW and MAGN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLW and MAGN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLW | 100% | +5.15% | ||
| MAGN - CLW | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| MATV - CLW | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| MERC - CLW | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.99% | ||
| SUZ - CLW | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CLW | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
MAGN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAGN has been loosely correlated with HELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAGN jumps, then HELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAGN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGN | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| HELE - MAGN | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| SPB - MAGN | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| MATV - MAGN | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| CLX - MAGN | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| KMB - MAGN | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EPEM | 29.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
| INOV | 36.73 | -0.18 | -0.49% |
| Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF November (INOV) | |||
| DISV | 42.41 | -0.22 | -0.52% |
| Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) | |||
| JPXN | 98.31 | -1.29 | -1.29% |
| iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) | |||
| ARGT | 73.71 | -1.60 | -2.12% |
| Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) | |||