CMA
Price
$73.88
Change
-$4.73 (-6.02%)
Updated
Oct 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.03B
One day until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FNB
Price
$14.66
Change
-$1.13 (-7.16%)
Updated
Oct 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.67B
Earnings call today
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs FNB

Header iconCMA vs FNB Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs FNBBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$73.88
Change-$4.73 (-6.02%)
Volume$53.6K
Capitalization10.03B
FNB
Price$14.66
Change-$1.13 (-7.16%)
Volume$290.67K
Capitalization5.67B
CMA vs FNB Comparison Chart in %
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. FNB commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and FNB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $78.61 vs. FNB: $15.79)
Brand notoriety: CMA and FNB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 138% vs. FNB: 297%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $10.03B vs. FNB: $5.67B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.03B. FNB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the short-term than FNB.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.57% price change this week, while FNB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

FNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($10B) has a higher market cap than FNB($5.67B). CMA has higher P/E ratio than FNB: CMA (15.09) vs FNB (12.24). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 31.634 vs. FNB (9.431). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. FNB (535M). FNB has less debt than CMA: FNB (3.71B) vs CMA (8.69B). CMA has higher revenues than FNB: CMA (3.31B) vs FNB (1.64B).
CMAFNBCMA / FNB
Capitalization10B5.67B176%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.6349.431335%
P/E Ratio15.0912.24123%
Revenue3.31B1.64B203%
Total Cash1.24B535M232%
Total Debt8.69B3.71B234%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs FNB: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
FNB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5125
SMR RATING
1..100
911
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1790

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (91) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAFNB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMPFX46.340.12
+0.26%
American Funds AMCAP F1
FVADX62.92N/A
N/A
Franklin Small Cap Value Adv
JIASX9.53N/A
N/A
JHancock Multi-Asset High Income R6
GABPX50.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P
JCAVX10.00N/A
N/A
JHFunds2 Capital Appreciation Value NAV