CMC
Price
$68.72
Change
+$0.31 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
7.6B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRLB
Price
$75.05
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMC vs PRLB

CMC vs PRLB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Commercial Metals Company (CMC) vs. Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is a global steel recycler, manufacturer, and fabricator with a market capitalization of approximately $7.5 billion and a trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) near 13, reflecting a value-oriented profile in the basic materials sector.
  • Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) is a digital manufacturing specialist producing custom prototypes and on-demand parts, carrying a market cap near $1.7 billion and a trailing P/E ratio above 65, indicating a growth-oriented valuation.
  • CMC has delivered robust revenue growth of over 20% year-over-year in recent quarters, supported by recovering steel margins, infrastructure demand, and its TAG operational excellence program, while also paying a consistent quarterly dividend.
  • PRLB has posted record quarterly and annual revenues, with approximately 12% year-over-year growth in its most recent quarter, driven by strong CNC Machining demand and expansion of its partner-based Protolabs Network.
  • Analyst consensus rates CMC a "Moderate Buy" with an average price target near $80, while PRLB holds a "Buy" consensus with a target near $88 — though PRLB's extreme price momentum over the past year introduces higher volatility risk.
  • These two stocks represent fundamentally different risk-reward profiles: CMC offers cyclical value with dividend income, while PRLB offers digital-manufacturing growth at a premium multiple.

Introduction

Comparing CMC and PRLB is, in many ways, a study in contrasts. One is a century-old industrial steel company deeply tied to construction cycles and infrastructure spending; the other is a technology-enabled digital manufacturer riding the wave of faster product development cycles and e-commerce-driven sourcing. For investors and traders evaluating market positioning, this head-to-head comparison illuminates how two very different industrial-sector companies are navigating the current macroeconomic landscape — one defined by shifting interest rate expectations, evolving trade policies, and uneven manufacturing demand. Whether you are a value-oriented investor seeking steady dividends or a growth-focused trader looking for momentum, understanding the relative strengths and vulnerabilities of these two names can sharpen your perspective on sector allocation and stock selection.

CMC Overview and Recent Performance

Commercial Metals Company (CMC), headquartered in Irving, Texas, operates an integrated network of scrap recycling facilities, electric arc furnace steel mills, and fabrication plants across North America and Europe. The company's three operating segments — North America Steel Group, Europe Steel Group, and Emerging Businesses Group (EBG) — produce reinforcing bar (rebar), merchant bar, wire rod, and other long steel products primarily used in construction, infrastructure, and industrial applications. In recent months, CMC has demonstrated considerable earnings momentum. The company's most recently reported quarterly results showed earnings per share (EPS) of $1.73, exceeding consensus estimates, on revenue of approximately $2.48 billion — a year-over-year increase of nearly 23%. This performance has been underpinned by recovering steel product metal margins, solid North American construction demand, and growing contributions from the EBG segment, which includes high-margin proprietary products such as corrosion-resistant reinforcing steel and geogrid solutions.

Several factors have shaped CMC's market sentiment in recent weeks. The company's Transform, Advance, and Grow (TAG) operational excellence program has exceeded initial expectations, contributing to margin expansion across multiple business lines. Additionally, CMC's announced acquisitions of Foley Products Company and Concrete Pipe & Precast are expected to establish a new growth platform in concrete infrastructure products, broadening the company's portfolio beyond steel. On the risk side, the company has navigated the lingering financial impact of litigation related to its Pacific Steel Group, though the core operational trajectory has remained positive. With a trailing P/E ratio near 13, a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share (yielding approximately 1.2%), and a 52-week trading range spanning roughly $50 to $85, CMC presents a profile that appeals to investors seeking cyclical value with income.

PRLB Overview and Recent Performance

Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB), based in Maple Plain, Minnesota, is a leading digital manufacturer of custom prototypes and on-demand production parts. The company leverages advanced software, automation, and a global network of manufacturing partners to offer services including CNC (Computer Numerical Control) machining, injection molding, 3D printing, and sheet metal fabrication. Proto Labs serves product developers, engineers, and supply chain teams across a diverse range of end markets. The company closed its most recent fiscal year with record annual revenue of approximately $533 million, up 6.4% year-over-year, and followed this with a record quarterly revenue of roughly $136.5 million in the final quarter — a 12.1% increase from the prior-year period. CNC Machining has been the standout growth driver, with revenue in that category expanding by approximately 25% year-over-year.

Recent market activity surrounding PRLB has reflected both enthusiasm for the company's accelerating top-line growth and caution regarding its valuation and margin trajectory. Revenue per customer contact has risen meaningfully, signaling deeper engagement with existing clients, though total customer contacts have declined modestly. The company's Protolabs Network — a partner-driven fulfillment channel — has grown rapidly, contributing to overall revenue diversification but also introducing some gross margin compression, as network-fulfilled orders carry lower margins than in-house factory production. Proto Labs maintains a debt-free balance sheet with cash and investments exceeding $140 million, providing financial flexibility for strategic investments. With a trailing P/E ratio above 65, no dividend, and a 52-week range from approximately $39 to $83, PRLB trades at a pronounced premium that reflects the market's expectation of sustained double-digit revenue growth and margin improvement under a new transformation strategy announced by leadership.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of tickers across equity markets, but only the strongest performers — those best aligned with prevailing market conditions — earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots span a wide variety of trading styles, from short-term momentum strategies to longer-duration swing and trend-following approaches, and they each come with detailed performance statistics, including win rates, trade counts, and drawdown metrics. Some bots in the curated selection have demonstrated win rates exceeding 70%, while others specialize in specific sectors or volatility regimes. Every bot operates with its own distinct strategy, risk framework, and ticker universe. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify which automated strategies are currently producing the strongest signals in this market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking contrast between CMC and PRLB lies in their valuation and growth profiles. CMC trades at a P/E multiple of approximately 13, reflecting its position as a cyclical industrial company with earnings tied to steel prices and construction activity. PRLB, by comparison, commands a P/E above 65 — a premium that prices in expectations of sustained double-digit revenue growth and margin expansion from its digital manufacturing platform. On growth: CMC's recent year-over-year revenue expansion of over 20% has actually outpaced PRLB's roughly 12%, though CMC's growth is partly driven by recovering steel margins rather than secular demand trends, making it more sensitive to commodity cycles. PRLB's growth, while slower in percentage terms, is driven by structural trends in digital manufacturing adoption and product development outsourcing.

From a risk perspective, the two stocks diverge meaningfully. CMC faces exposure to steel price volatility, construction cycle timing, trade policy shifts, and the capital-intensive nature of its industry — but it offsets some of this with geographic diversification, a growing high-margin EBG segment, and a long track record of returning capital to shareholders through 244 consecutive quarterly dividend payments. PRLB, conversely, carries no debt and operates an asset-light model with strong free cash flow, but it faces competitive threats from other digital manufacturing platforms, margin pressure from its network fulfillment mix, and the challenge of reigniting customer acquisition growth. Market sentiment in recent weeks has favored PRLB's momentum — the stock is up approximately 48% year-to-date — while CMC has traded roughly flat over the same period, reflecting a rotation toward growth names. However, PRLB's 1-year surge of nearly 90% also raises questions about how much positive expectation is already priced in.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend patterns, fundamental stability, and relative risk positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of CMC in the current environment, though with important caveats. CMC's combination of a low valuation multiple, accelerating earnings momentum, strong revenue growth above 20%, consistent dividend payments, and a broadening business mix through the EBG segment and recent acquisitions creates a multi-dimensional case for trend consistency and fundamental support. While PRLB exhibits stronger recent price momentum and operates in an attractive secular growth niche within digital manufacturing, its elevated valuation multiple and the recent pullback from mid-July highs — dropping from above $80 to near $71 in roughly two weeks — suggest the stock may be entering a period of increased volatility after an extended rally. An AI-driven framework, which typically weights trend durability and risk-adjusted return metrics, would likely recognize CMC's steadier trajectory and more balanced risk-reward profile as the more probabilistically favorable setup. That said, PRLB's transformation strategy and debt-free balance sheet keep it firmly in the conversation for traders with higher risk tolerance and a longer time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CMC vs. PRLB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMC is a StrongBuy and PRLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CMC: $68.72 vs. PRLB: $75.05)
Brand notoriety: CMC and PRLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMC: 74% vs. PRLB: 127%
Market capitalization -- CMC: $7.6B vs. PRLB: $1.79B
CMC [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $7.6B. PRLB’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the long-term than PRLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMC is a better buy in the short-term than PRLB.

Price Growth

CMC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -0.33% price change this week, while PRLB (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

PRLB is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (-5.07% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMC($7.6B) has a higher market cap than PRLB($1.79B). PRLB has higher P/E ratio than CMC: PRLB (70.80) vs CMC (12.99). PRLB YTD gains are higher at: 48.349 vs. CMC (0.162). CMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. PRLB (66.2M). CMC has more cash in the bank: 560M vs. PRLB (136M). PRLB has less debt than CMC: PRLB (2.62M) vs CMC (3.4B). CMC has higher revenues than PRLB: CMC (8.85B) vs PRLB (546M).
CMCPRLBCMC / PRLB
Capitalization7.6B1.79B426%
EBITDA1.15B66.2M1,734%
Gain YTD0.16248.3490%
P/E Ratio12.9970.8018%
Revenue8.85B546M1,621%
Total Cash560M136M412%
Total Debt3.4B2.62M129,721%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMC vs PRLB: Fundamental Ratings
CMC
PRLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30100
SMR RATING
1..100
6187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6535

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMC's Valuation (19) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRLB (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRLB (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew significantly faster than PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

CMC's SMR Rating (61) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as PRLB (87) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CMC’s stock grew similarly to PRLB’s over the last 12 months.

PRLB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CMC (46) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that PRLB’s stock grew similarly to CMC’s over the last 12 months.

PRLB's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMC (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that PRLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCPRLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEM26.690.38
+1.43%
Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
PRFD50.55N/A
N/A
PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd
UTES77.57-0.02
-0.03%
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
CAFG33.50-0.02
-0.06%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
TLTI43.50-0.28
-0.65%
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Yr Trsy Bd ETF

PRLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRLB has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRLB jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRLB
1D Price
Change %
PRLB100%
-0.12%
CODI - PRLB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
NWPX - PRLB
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
CMC - PRLB
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
WOR - PRLB
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
ESAB - PRLB
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More