CMCO
Price
$15.02
Change
+$0.10 (+0.67%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.28B
29 days until earnings call
FSV
Price
$172.14
Change
+$1.21 (+0.71%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.45B
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMCO vs FSV

Header iconCMCO vs FSV Comparison
Open Charts CMCO vs FSVBanner chart's image
Columbus McKinnon
Price$15.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.67%)
Volume$4.53K
Capitalization1.28B
FirstService
Price$172.14
Change+$1.21 (+0.71%)
Volume$800
Capitalization7.45B
CMCO vs FSV Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMCO vs. FSV commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMCO is a StrongBuy and FSV is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CMCO: $15.02 vs. FSV: $171.99)
Brand notoriety: CMCO and FSV are both not notable
CMCO represents the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery, while FSV is part of the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMCO: 48% vs. FSV: 57%
Market capitalization -- CMCO: $1.28B vs. FSV: $7.45B
CMCO [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $1.28B. FSV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $7.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.28B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCO is a better buy in the long-term than FSV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSV is a better buy in the short-term than CMCO.

Price Growth

CMCO (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +15.72% price change this week, while FSV (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +5.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMCO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

FSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+5.19% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

@Real Estate Development (+1.24% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($7.45B) has a higher market cap than CMCO($1.28B). FSV has higher P/E ratio than CMCO: FSV (73.74) vs CMCO (25.65). FSV YTD gains are higher at: -4.831 vs. CMCO (-59.586). FSV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 379M vs. CMCO (150M). FSV has more cash in the bank: 188M vs. CMCO (103M). CMCO has less debt than FSV: CMCO (550M) vs FSV (1.42B). FSV has higher revenues than CMCO: FSV (4.34B) vs CMCO (1B).
CMCOFSVCMCO / FSV
Capitalization1.28B7.45B17%
EBITDA150M379M40%
Gain YTD-59.586-4.8311,233%
P/E Ratio25.6573.7435%
Revenue1B4.34B23%
Total Cash103M188M55%
Total Debt550M1.42B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMCO vs FSV: Fundamental Ratings
CMCO
FSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
8961
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
873
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCO's Valuation (50) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as FSV (50) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CMCO’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCO (100) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCO’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CMCO (89) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to CMCO’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMCO (95) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMCO’s over the last 12 months.

CMCO's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (73) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CMCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMCOFSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEKCX16.16N/A
N/A
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
PVMIX14.70N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Value I Inst
IMLPX10.07N/A
N/A
MainGate MLP I
VEVYX42.81N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
THPBX22.74N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Balanced Opportunity J

CMCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMCO has been loosely correlated with OSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMCO jumps, then OSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCO
1D Price
Change %
CMCO100%
+0.67%
OSK - CMCO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ALG - CMCO
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ACA - CMCO
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
KIGRY - CMCO
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
CAT - CMCO
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
More

FSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSV
1D Price
Change %
FSV100%
+0.62%
CIGI - FSV
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
CBRE - FSV
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
JLL - FSV
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
NMRK - FSV
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
MMI - FSV
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More