PWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CMDT | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDT and PWR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDT and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMDT | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| PWR - CMDT | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.70% | ||
| MDLZ - CMDT | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.03% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | +2.70% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 80% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| FIX - PWR | 75% Closely correlated | +5.33% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 67% Closely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| EME - PWR | 66% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||