CMG
Price
$56.98
Change
+$0.21 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
78.47B
20 days until earnings call
SBUX
Price
$94.44
Change
+$0.26 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
107.03B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs SBUX

Header iconCMG vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs SBUXBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$56.98
Change+$0.21 (+0.37%)
Volume$100
Capitalization78.47B
Starbucks
Price$94.44
Change+$0.26 (+0.28%)
Volume$554.23K
Capitalization107.03B
CMG vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. SBUX commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a Buy and SBUX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $56.77 vs. SBUX: $94.18)
Brand notoriety: CMG and SBUX are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 113% vs. SBUX: 73%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $78.47B vs. SBUX: $107.03B
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $78.47B. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $107.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.96% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.70% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($107B) has a higher market cap than CMG($78.5B). CMG has higher P/E ratio than SBUX: CMG (50.24) vs SBUX (34.25). SBUX YTD gains are higher at: 4.502 vs. CMG (-5.854). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.34B vs. CMG (2.36B). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 3.01B vs. CMG (1.42B). CMG has less debt than SBUX: CMG (4.63B) vs SBUX (26B). SBUX has higher revenues than CMG: SBUX (36.3B) vs CMG (11.5B).
CMGSBUXCMG / SBUX
Capitalization78.5B107B73%
EBITDA2.36B6.34B37%
Gain YTD-5.8544.502-130%
P/E Ratio50.2434.25147%
Revenue11.5B36.3B32%
Total Cash1.42B3.01B47%
Total Debt4.63B26B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2567
SMR RATING
1..100
2111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (33) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (84). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (67). This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (11) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (21). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (47). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (82). This means that SBUX’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NANR58.411.06
+1.85%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF
BOXX112.660.01
+0.01%
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
SCDL33.89N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN
HEJD26.56N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Hedged Equity Income ETF
OCCI6.20-0.02
-0.40%
OFS Credit Company

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-0.78%
FRSH - SBUX
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.83%
YUM - SBUX
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
EAT - SBUX
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
KRUS - SBUX
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
SHAK - SBUX
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
More