SBUX
Price
$94.94
Change
-$0.21 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
107.89B
22 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$149.79
Change
-$2.56 (-1.68%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
41.64B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBUX vs YUM

Header iconSBUX vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts SBUX vs YUMBanner chart's image
Starbucks
Price$94.94
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
Volume$6.34M
Capitalization107.89B
Yum! Brands
Price$149.79
Change-$2.56 (-1.68%)
Volume$1.76M
Capitalization41.64B
SBUX vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBUX vs. YUM commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBUX is a Buy and YUM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SBUX: $94.94 vs. YUM: $149.79)
Brand notoriety: SBUX and YUM are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBUX: 69% vs. YUM: 94%
Market capitalization -- SBUX: $107.89B vs. YUM: $41.64B
SBUX [@Restaurants] is valued at $107.89B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $41.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $214.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBUX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SBUX and YUM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBUX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SBUX and YUM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SBUX (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($108B) has a higher market cap than YUM($41.6B). SBUX has higher P/E ratio than YUM: SBUX (34.52) vs YUM (29.84). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 12.728 vs. SBUX (5.345). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.34B vs. YUM (2.62B). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 3.01B vs. YUM (607M). YUM has less debt than SBUX: YUM (11.4B) vs SBUX (26B). SBUX has higher revenues than YUM: SBUX (36.3B) vs YUM (7.74B).
SBUXYUMSBUX / YUM
Capitalization108B41.6B260%
EBITDA6.34B2.62B242%
Gain YTD5.34512.72842%
P/E Ratio34.5229.84116%
Revenue36.3B7.74B469%
Total Cash3.01B607M496%
Total Debt26B11.4B228%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBUX vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
SBUX
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6216
SMR RATING
1..100
1110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5029
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBUX's Valuation (33) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (53). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (62). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (11). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (50). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (23). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBUXYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTLC51.19-0.17
-0.33%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF
MFSG26.55-0.09
-0.34%
MFS Active Growth ETF
DFP20.72-0.16
-0.77%
FLAHERTY & CRUMRINE DYNAMIC PREFERRED AND Income FUND
NERD25.28-0.23
-0.90%
Roundhill Video Games ETF
CNRG64.27-1.21
-1.85%
SPDR® Kensho Clean Power ETF

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-0.22%
FRSH - SBUX
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.65%
YUM - SBUX
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
KRUS - SBUX
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
EAT - SBUX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
SHAK - SBUX
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
-1.68%
MCD - YUM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
QSR - YUM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
YUMC - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
FRSH - YUM
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.65%
DPZ - YUM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More