Advertisement
FRSH vs SBUX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks (FRSH) vs. Starbucks (SBUX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FRSH has outperformed SBUX year-to-date with a 30.94% gain compared to 17.93%, driven by SaaS (software as a service) growth momentum.
- SBUX offers greater stability as a consumer staples giant with a $112 billion market cap versus FRSH's $2.36 billion.
- Both stocks leverage AI innovations: FRSH with Freddy AI and SBUX with a new AI platform for operations.
- FRSH achieved profitability in recent quarters with 14.5% revenue growth, while SBUX focuses on loyalty programs driving 60% of revenue.
- Recent market activity shows volatility for FRSH amid tech sector swings, contrasting SBUX's steady expansion investments.
- AI trading bots on Tickeron highlight opportunities in diverse sectors, including tech and consumer plays like these tickers.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits FRSH, a high-growth SaaS provider, against SBUX, a consumer staples powerhouse. Traders seeking momentum in technology or stability in retail may find value in analyzing their relative performance, sector exposures, and recent catalysts. With both incorporating AI advancements amid shifting market sentiment, this head-to-head review aids investors evaluating growth potential versus defensive positioning in the current environment.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) delivers cloud-based customer engagement software, including CRM (customer relationship management) and support tools powered by its Freddy AI platform. The company targets small and medium-sized businesses with subscription models generating strong annual recurring revenue (ARR). In recent market activity, FRSH shares have risen about 31% year-to-date, trading around $8.46 with a market cap of $2.36 billion and a 52-week range of $6.79 to $16.14. Key influences include a Q4 2025 earnings beat with 14.5% revenue growth to $222.7 million and ARR reaching $911.8 million, marking profitability amid AI-driven product adoption. Recent executive hires, like Senior Vice President for Global Channels, bolster partnerships, though analyst adjustments reflect volatility in software demand.
SBUX Overview and Recent Performance
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) operates a global network of coffeehouses, emphasizing premium beverages, food, and licensed stores. Its business model blends company-operated outlets with franchising, supported by a loyalty program accounting for 60% of U.S. revenue. Shares have climbed roughly 18% year-to-date to about $98.67, with a $112 billion market cap and 52-week range of $75.50 to $104.82. Recent sentiment stems from a $100 million Nashville hub investment targeting Southeastern U.S. growth, alongside a new AI platform for efficiency. Amid soft restaurant demand, upcoming quarterly results are anticipated to show modest gains, tempered by costs and competition, yet dividend yield of 2.51% appeals to income seekers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, selected from hundreds available—specifically 351 total robots analyzed, with 25 curated as trending based on current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies, from short-term scalping to long-term trend following, across thousands of tickers in growth sectors like technology and consumer goods. Performance metrics highlight high win rates, profit factors exceeding 1.5 in many cases, and average trade durations varying by timeframe. Ideal for hands-off trading, they adapt to volatility, offering backtested stats and real-time signals. Explore these bots to align with strategies suiting FRSH or SBUX exposures.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FRSH and SBUX diverge sharply in business models: subscription SaaS for scalable software versus asset-heavy retail with franchised expansion. Growth drivers favor FRSH's 14-15% revenue trajectory and AI integrations over SBUX's steady but lower single-digit comps sales. Recent momentum tilts to FRSH with superior YTD returns, though SBUX edges one-year gains slightly. Risk profiles show comparable low betas (0.87 for FRSH, 0.94 for SBUX), but tech exposure heightens FRSH's volatility versus SBUX's defensive consumer staples positioning. Market sentiment remains constructive for both, with catalysts like partnerships for FRSH and regional investments for SBUX, presenting trade-offs in growth versus resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward FRSH due to its stronger year-to-date momentum, profitability inflection, and SaaS growth prospects amid AI adoption trends. While SBUX provides scale and stability, FRSH's relative outperformance and lower valuation multiples suggest higher probability of near-term upside in favorable tech conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and SBUX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
SBUX is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.44% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Restaurants (-3.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FRSH | SBUX | FRSH / SBUX | |
| Capitalization | 2.54B | 115B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 4.77B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -24.980 | 20.397 | -122% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.54 | 76.45 | 19% |
| Revenue | 871M | 38.5B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 779M | 1.7B | 46% |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 24.4B | 0% |
FRSH | SBUX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBUX's Valuation (21) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (56). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (99). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (51). This means that SBUX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (62). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (31). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | SBUX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 22 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGHG | 78.39 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| ProShares Investment Grade—Intr Rt Hdgd | |||
| TMFC | 74.87 | -0.94 | -1.24% |
| Motley Fool 100 ETF | |||
| CGGG | 28.02 | -0.60 | -2.10% |
| Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF | |||
| FFEM | 42.78 | -2.65 | -5.83% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | |||
| EET | 113.99 | -13.87 | -10.85% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
SBUX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBUX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBUX | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| FRSH - SBUX | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| YUM - SBUX | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CAKE - SBUX | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| BLMN - SBUX | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| CMG - SBUX | 37% Loosely correlated | -6.00% | ||
More | ||||