Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGACX
CMLIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGACX
CMLIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. CMLIX (591M). CMLIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.66). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). RGACX (11.41) and CMLIX (10.88) have marching annual gain over last year. CMLIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.18 vs. RGACX (16.59).
| CMLIX | RGACX | CMLIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.833 | 8.547 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 591M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 11.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.35 | 46.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.18 | 16.59 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.42 | 112.59 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement