Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMLIX vs RGACX
CMLIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CMLIX vs RGACX
CMLIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMLIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMLIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. CMLIX (590M). CMLIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CMLIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CMLIX (98 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CMLIX (0.66). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CMLIX (22.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMLIX: RGACX (250) vs CMLIX (100000). CMLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. RGACX (3.68). CMLIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.38 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| CMLIX | RGACX | CMLIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 98 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.016 | 6.959 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 3.68 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.39 | 37.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 13.46 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.05 | 97.58 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement