Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMNIX vs PSCAX
CMNIX vs PSCAX Comparison
Open Charts CMNIX vs PSCAX
CMNIX vs PSCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMNIX vs. PSCAX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMNIX is a Hold and PSCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMNIX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. PSCAX (411M). PSCAX pays higher dividends than CMNIX: PSCAX (3.30) vs CMNIX (1.67). CMNIX was incepted earlier than PSCAX: CMNIX (26 years) vs PSCAX (14 years). PSCAX (2.31) is less costly to investors than CMNIX (1.01). PSCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 236.00 vs. CMNIX (43.00). PSCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMNIX: PSCAX (2500) vs CMNIX (1000000). CMNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. PSCAX (2.62). CMNIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.41 vs. PSCAX (8.91).
| CMNIX | PSCAX | CMNIX / PSCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.69 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.31 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.215 | 3.371 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7B | 411M | 4,550% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 3.30 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 2.62 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.10 | 20.69 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.41 | 8.91 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.48 | 36.68 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement