Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNBS vs TAN
CNBS vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts CNBS vs TAN
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
Price$27.75
Change-$2.77 (-9.08%)
Volume$270.36K
Net Assets108.46M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$39.84
Change+$3.22 (+8.79%)
Volume$2.18M
Net Assets636.66M
CNBS vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNBS vs. TAN commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNBS is a StrongBuy and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 637M vs. CNBS (108M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than CNBS: TAN (20.290) vs CNBS (12.805). CNBS was incepted earlier than TAN: CNBS (6 years) vs TAN (17 years). TAN (0.71) has a lower expense ratio than CNBS (0.76). TAN has a higher turnover CNBS (2.00) vs CNBS (2.00).
| CNBS | TAN | CNBS / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 12.805 | 20.290 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 108M | 637M | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.71 | 107% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 43.00 | 5% |
| Yield | 60.79 | 0.45 | 13,587% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CNBS | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CNBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNBS has been loosely correlated with TLRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNBS jumps, then TLRY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNBS | 100% | -9.07% | ||
| TLRY - CNBS | 51% Loosely correlated | -12.71% | ||
| CRON - CNBS | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.95% | ||
| SNDL - CNBS | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| VFF - CNBS | 43% Loosely correlated | -8.87% | ||
| MAPS - CNBS | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.60% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +8.79% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | +7.45% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +11.05% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | +17.10% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | +32.82% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 68% Closely correlated | +8.13% | ||
More | ||||