Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNGLX vs CWGCX
CNGLX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts CNGLX vs CWGCX
CNGLX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNGLX vs. CWGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNGLX is a Hold and CWGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CNGLX (17.9M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than CNGLX: CWGCX (0.75) vs CNGLX (0.00). CNGLX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: CNGLX (24 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). CNGLX (2.58) is less costly to investors than CWGCX (1.48). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNGLX (7.00). CNGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: CNGLX (200) vs CWGCX (250). CWGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. CNGLX (10.01). CWGCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.03 vs. CNGLX (7.81).
| CNGLX | CWGCX | CNGLX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.58 | 1.48 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.58 | 1.48 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.615 | 13.037 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 250 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.01 | 17.91 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.65 | 46.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.81 | 28.03 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.29 | 98.70 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement