Advertisement
CNM vs DPLMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNM is a Hold and DPLMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDPLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DPLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPLMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DPLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CNM (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -8.80% price change this week, while DPLMF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.81%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNM is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (-4.30% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| CNM | DPLMF | CNM / DPLMF | |
| Capitalization | 8.71B | 9.28B | 94% |
| EBITDA | 926M | 345M | 268% |
| Gain YTD | -10.253 | 21.405 | -48% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.40 | 39.95 | 51% |
| Revenue | 7.74B | 1.45B | 532% |
| Total Cash | 25M | 65.4M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 2.53B | 506M | 501% |
| CNM | DPLMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 14% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
CNM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNM has been loosely correlated with FERG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNM jumps, then FERG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNM | 100% | +1.65% | ||
| FERG - CNM | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| AIT - CNM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| SITE - CNM | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| BXC - CNM | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| WCC - CNM | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
DPLMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DPLMF and HPURF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPLMF and HPURF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DPLMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPLMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HPURF - DPLMF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CNM - DPLMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| IVCHF - DPLMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FERG - DPLMF | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.36% |