CNP
Price
$40.68
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
26.8B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PEG
Price
$75.66
Change
+$0.62 (+0.83%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
37.71B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNP vs PEG

CNP vs PEG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CNP and PEG operate as regulated utilities with stable demand profiles and exposure to energy infrastructure growth.
  • CNP reported Q2 2026 non-GAAP EPS of $0.40, beating consensus estimates, and raised its 10-year capital plan while reiterating full-year guidance.
  • PEG maintains a consistent dividend history and benefits from regulatory frameworks in its core New Jersey market amid broader sector demand for grid modernization.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks exhibiting defensive characteristics typical of the utilities sector, with limited volatility compared to broader market indices.
  • Key contrasts include CNP’s emphasis on Texas market expansion versus PEG’s focus on electric and gas distribution in the Northeast.
  • Sector sentiment remains supported by long-term electrification trends and infrastructure spending, influencing relative performance in recent weeks.

Introduction

This comparison examines CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), two established players in the regulated utilities sector. The analysis highlights differences in business focus, recent operational updates, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating defensive equity exposure. Those interested in income generation, sector rotation strategies, or relative value within utilities may find the side-by-side review particularly relevant amid evolving energy demand patterns.

CNP Overview and Recent Performance

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) delivers electric and natural gas services primarily in Texas, Indiana, Ohio, and other regions. In recent weeks, the company posted stronger-than-expected Q2 2026 results, with non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $0.40 surpassing analyst consensus. Management reiterated its 2026 non-GAAP EPS guidance range of at least the midpoint of $1.89–$1.91 and expanded its 10-year capital expenditure plan. Additional developments include a quarterly dividend increase and a subordinated notes offering. These factors contributed to constructive sentiment around load growth opportunities, particularly in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) market, supporting relative stability in recent market activity.

PEG Overview and Recent Performance

Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) provides electric and gas utility services mainly in New Jersey through its subsidiaries. The company has maintained steady operational performance aligned with regulatory recovery mechanisms in its service territory. Recent market activity reflects the defensive qualities typical of the sector, with attention on grid reliability investments and clean energy transitions. Broader utilities sentiment, driven by infrastructure needs, has provided a supportive backdrop without notable single-event catalysts specific to PEG in the latest period. Dividend consistency and predictable earnings streams continue to underpin its profile among income-focused market participants.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing artificial intelligence trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, with historical win rates often falling between 55% and 75% depending on the strategy, timeframes from intraday to multi-week, and varying risk parameters. Each bot employs distinct approaches, including momentum, mean-reversion, and trend-following styles, along with unique ticker sets and statistical profiles. Trending AI Robots

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both companies function within the regulated utilities sector, yet diverge in geographic and operational emphasis. CNP benefits from exposure to high-growth Texas markets and recent load increases, while PEG operates under established Northeast regulatory structures with a balanced electric and gas portfolio. Recent momentum favors CNP following its earnings beat and capital plan expansion, whereas PEG offers more predictable regulatory recovery without comparable near-term headline catalysts. Risk factors for CNP include weather variability and regulatory proceedings in ERCOT, while PEG faces typical Northeast infrastructure and transition costs. Sector exposure remains comparable, with both positioned to capitalize on electrification, though market sentiment has tilted slightly toward growth-oriented utilities in recent activity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, capital investment signals, and relative positioning within the utilities sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to CNP. Stronger trend alignment from its Q2 results and expanded growth initiatives provide a modest advantage in the current environment, though outcomes remain subject to broader market and regulatory developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CNP vs. PEG commentary
Aug 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNP is a StrongBuy and PEG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CNP: $40.68 vs. PEG: $75.66)
Brand notoriety: CNP and PEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNP: 110% vs. PEG: 78%
Market capitalization -- CNP: $26.8B vs. PEG: $37.71B
CNP [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $26.8B. PEG’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $37.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $176.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $30.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNP is a better buy in the long-term than PEG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PEG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNP is a better buy in the short-term than PEG.

Price Growth

CNP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while PEG (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

PEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.28% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEG($37.7B) has a higher market cap than CNP($26.8B). CNP has higher P/E ratio than PEG: CNP (24.21) vs PEG (18.82). CNP YTD gains are higher at: 7.273 vs. PEG (-4.196). PEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.07B vs. CNP (4B). PEG (24.4B) and CNP (24.6B) have identical debt. PEG has higher revenues than CNP: PEG (12.8B) vs CNP (9.62B).
CNPPEGCNP / PEG
Capitalization26.8B37.7B71%
EBITDA4B5.07B79%
Gain YTD7.273-4.196-173%
P/E Ratio24.2118.82129%
Revenue9.62B12.8B75%
Total Cash453MN/A-
Total Debt24.6B24.4B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNP vs PEG: Fundamental Ratings
CNP
PEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6351
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1437
SMR RATING
1..100
7362
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNP's Valuation (66) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PEG (79). This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PEG (37). This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.

PEG's SMR Rating (62) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (73). This means that PEG’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PEG (61). This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PEG (69). This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to PEG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNPPEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PEG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNTN11.110.12
+1.09%
MNTN Inc.
CQP64.71-0.51
-0.78%
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
KNTK49.18-0.99
-1.97%
Kinetik Holdings
MRT1.75-0.05
-2.51%
Marti Technologies
PLAG0.56-0.03
-4.27%
Planet Green Holdings Corp

CNP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNP has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNP jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNP
1D Price
Change %
CNP100%
+0.02%
WEC - CNP
83%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
AEE - CNP
82%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
DTE - CNP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
LNT - CNP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
DUK - CNP
79%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More

PEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEG has been closely correlated with BKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEG jumps, then BKH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEG
1D Price
Change %
PEG100%
+0.83%
BKH - PEG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
AEE - PEG
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
ETR - PEG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
CMS - PEG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
OGE - PEG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
More