Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs SGARX
CNPAX vs SGARX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs SGARX
CNPAX vs SGARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. SGARX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and SGARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. SGARX (136M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than SGARX: CNPAX (0.95) vs SGARX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than SGARX: CNPAX (24 years) vs SGARX (16 years). SGARX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.74). SGARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (23.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGARX: CNPAX (250) vs SGARX (2500000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. SGARX (-20.38). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.10 vs. SGARX (-36.57).
| CNPAX | SGARX | CNPAX / SGARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.03 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.752 | -6.912 | -54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 136M | 125,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -20.38 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | -19.39 | -169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.10 | -36.57 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.33 | 29.48 | 381% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement