Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs WAGSX
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529E
Price$70.59
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.12B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.91
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.07M
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. WAGSX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. WAGSX (13.1M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPEX (0.26) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPEX (24 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (1.00). CNPEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPEX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). CNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.60 vs. WAGSX (5.91). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.74 vs. WAGSX (5.22).
| CNPEX | WAGSX | CNPEX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.57 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.357 | 6.959 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 13.1M | 1,221,374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.60 | 5.91 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.28 | 35.18 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.74 | 5.22 | 743% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement