Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPEX vs WAGSX
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPEX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective 529E
Price$65.29
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.96B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$13.13
Change+$0.11 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.92M
CNPEX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPEX vs. WAGSX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPEX is a Buy and WAGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPEX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. WAGSX (14.9M). CNPEX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: CNPEX (0.28) vs WAGSX (0.00). CNPEX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: CNPEX (23 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than CNPEX (1.00). CNPEX (24.00) and WAGSX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. CNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAGSX: CNPEX (250) vs WAGSX (2000). WAGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. CNPEX (10.54). CNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.22 vs. WAGSX (13.58).
| CNPEX | WAGSX | CNPEX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.36 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 2.57 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.545 | 8.782 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 14.9M | 1,006,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.54 | 13.58 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.46 | 32.09 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.22 | 13.58 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement