Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs PAXGX
CNPFX vs PAXGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs PAXGX
CNPFX vs PAXGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. PAXGX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and PAXGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. PAXGX (95.7M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than PAXGX: CNPFX (1.12) vs PAXGX (0.16). CNPFX was incepted earlier than PAXGX: CNPFX (24 years) vs PAXGX (8 years). PAXGX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). PAXGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAXGX: CNPFX (250) vs PAXGX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.28 vs. PAXGX (-1.23). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.08 vs. PAXGX (9.89).
| CNPFX | PAXGX | CNPFX / PAXGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.23 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.833 | 5.596 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 95.7M | 179,728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.16 | 688% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | -1.23 | -509% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.42 | 16.17 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.08 | 9.89 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement