Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.14
Change+$0.17 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.62B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.04
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets484.9M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. RGPAX (485M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.65) vs RGPAX (0.36). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.70 vs. CNPFX (19.70). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.14 vs. CNPFX (39.53).
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.52 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.904 | 11.020 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157B | 485M | 32,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.36 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.70 | 21.70 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.78 | 33.21 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.53 | 42.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement