Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$66.16
Change+$0.41 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$22.02
Change+$0.12 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets523.46M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. RGPAX (523M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.68) vs RGPAX (0.38). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (5 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. CNPFX (9.39). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.84 vs. RGPAX (43.41).
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.52 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.995 | 5.848 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 523M | 28,681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.38 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 11.16 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.15 | 26.79 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.84 | 43.41 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement