Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.35
Change+$0.19 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.12B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$22.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.55M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. RGPAX (476M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.65) vs RGPAX (0.37). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (5 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.62 vs. CNPFX (8.97). RGPAX (44.02) and CNPFX (41.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.52 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.603 | 8.845 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 476M | 32,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.37 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | 10.62 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.86 | 38.31 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.89 | 44.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers