Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$23.83
Change-$0.09 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets504.81M
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGPAX (505M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (0.62) vs RGPAX (0.35). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (23 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.24 vs. CNPFX (13.98). RGPAX (39.40) and CNPFX (38.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 8.20 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.440 | 15.611 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 505M | 32,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.35 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | 15.24 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 58.37 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.24 | 39.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement