Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs RGPAX
CNPFX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. RGPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and RGPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. RGPAX (463M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than RGPAX: CNPFX (1.12) vs RGPAX (0.27). CNPFX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: CNPFX (24 years) vs RGPAX (6 years). RGPAX (8.20) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: CNPFX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.71 vs. CNPFX (14.01). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.29 vs. CNPFX (20.84).
| CNPFX | RGPAX | CNPFX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 8.20 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | 4.867 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 463M | 35,421% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.27 | 410% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 15.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | 51.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | 22.29 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement