Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs SGARX
CNPFX vs SGARX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs SGARX
CNPFX vs SGARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. SGARX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and SGARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. SGARX (160M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than SGARX: CNPFX (1.12) vs SGARX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than SGARX: CNPFX (24 years) vs SGARX (15 years). SGARX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.83). SGARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGARX: CNPFX (250) vs SGARX (2500000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. SGARX (-12.40). CNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.84 vs. SGARX (-29.74).
| CNPFX | SGARX | CNPFX / SGARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.90 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.03 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.300 | -2.334 | -313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 160M | 102,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | -12.40 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.66 | -11.26 | -397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.84 | -29.74 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 43.21 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement