Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs TRGLX
CNPFX vs TRGLX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs TRGLX
CNPFX vs TRGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. TRGLX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and TRGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 172B vs. TRGLX (8.68B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than TRGLX: CNPFX (1.12) vs TRGLX (0.25). CNPFX was incepted earlier than TRGLX: CNPFX (24 years) vs TRGLX (9 years). CNPFX (0.83) is less costly to investors than TRGLX (0.66). TRGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. CNPFX (23.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGLX: CNPFX (250) vs TRGLX (500000). TRGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.16 vs. CNPFX (6.28). TRGLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.18 vs. CNPFX (14.08).
| CNPFX | TRGLX | CNPFX / TRGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.66 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.66 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.833 | 20.281 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172B | 8.68B | 1,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.25 | 440% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 22.16 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.42 | 58.82 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.08 | 16.18 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement