CNS
Price
$81.42
Change
+$0.63 (+0.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.19B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TROW
Price
$111.51
Change
-$0.68 (-0.61%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
23.79B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNS vs TROW

CNS vs TROW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. TROW commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Hold and TROW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CNS: $81.42 vs. TROW: $111.51)
Brand notoriety: CNS and TROW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 52% vs. TROW: 52%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $4.19B vs. TROW: $23.79B
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.19B. TROW’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTROW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TROW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TROW is a better buy in the long-term than CNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TROW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TROW is a better buy in the short-term than CNS.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.92% price change this week, while TROW (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

TROW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TROW($23.8B) has a higher market cap than CNS($4.19B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than TROW: CNS (25.05) vs TROW (11.20). CNS YTD gains are higher at: 33.329 vs. TROW (11.866). TROW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.18B vs. CNS (228M). TROW has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. CNS (187M). CNS has less debt than TROW: CNS (134M) vs TROW (429M). TROW has higher revenues than CNS: TROW (7.59B) vs CNS (605M).
CNSTROWCNS / TROW
Capitalization4.19B23.8B18%
EBITDA228M3.18B7%
Gain YTD33.32911.866281%
P/E Ratio25.0511.20224%
Revenue605M7.59B8%
Total Cash187M3.23B6%
Total Debt134M429M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs TROW: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
TROW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
3345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TROW's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (74). This means that TROW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TROW (100). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TROW (45). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TROW (49). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TROW (53). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSTROW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TROW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TQQY12.220.08
+0.62%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
CHGX33.05N/A
N/A
EA SERIES TRUST STANCE SUSTAINABLE BETA ETF
PPA173.67-0.10
-0.06%
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
VMO9.68-0.01
-0.10%
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust
FEIG39.91-0.06
-0.15%
Northern Trust ESG&ClmtInvmGrdCorpCorETF

CNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNS has been loosely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNS jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNS
1D Price
Change %
CNS100%
+0.78%
CG - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
BX - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
BLK - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BAM - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
KKR - CNS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
More

TROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TROW
1D Price
Change %
TROW100%
-0.61%
APAM - TROW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BX - TROW
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
FHI - TROW
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
KKR - TROW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
STT - TROW
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More