CNSWF
Price
$3391.66
Change
-$42.62 (-1.24%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
44.8B
Earnings call today
SAP
Price
$290.40
Change
-$5.06 (-1.71%)
Updated
Aug 8, 10:54 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
227.47B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNSWF vs SAP

Header iconCNSWF vs SAP Comparison
Open Charts CNSWF vs SAPBanner chart's image
Constellation Software
Price$3391.66
Change-$42.62 (-1.24%)
Volume$806
Capitalization44.8B
SAP SE
Price$290.40
Change-$5.06 (-1.71%)
Volume$730
Capitalization227.47B
CNSWF vs SAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNSWF vs. SAP commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSWF is a Hold and SAP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CNSWF: $3391.66 vs. SAP: $295.46)
Brand notoriety: CNSWF and SAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNSWF: 89% vs. SAP: 144%
Market capitalization -- CNSWF: $44.8B vs. SAP: $227.47B
CNSWF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $44.8B. SAP’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $227.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNSWF and SAP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNSWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAP is a better buy in the short-term than CNSWF.

Price Growth

CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while SAP (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

SAP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAP($227B) has a higher market cap than CNSWF($44.8B). CNSWF has higher P/E ratio than SAP: CNSWF (86.96) vs SAP (58.94). SAP YTD gains are higher at: 21.052 vs. CNSWF (9.508). SAP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.5B vs. CNSWF (1.51B). SAP has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. CNSWF (1.01B). CNSWF has less debt than SAP: CNSWF (2.38B) vs SAP (8.79B). SAP has higher revenues than CNSWF: SAP (31.2B) vs CNSWF (7.11B).
CNSWFSAPCNSWF / SAP
Capitalization44.8B227B20%
EBITDA1.51B7.5B20%
Gain YTD9.50821.05245%
P/E Ratio86.9658.94148%
Revenue7.11B31.2B23%
Total Cash1.01B11.5B9%
Total Debt2.38B8.79B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNSWF vs SAP: Fundamental Ratings
CNSWF
SAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
546
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
421
SMR RATING
1..100
3553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1246

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAP's Valuation (18) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNSWF (86) in the null industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew significantly faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SAP (21) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SAP (53) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

SAP's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CNSWF (60) in the null industry. This means that SAP’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.

CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as SAP (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to SAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSWFSAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNSWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORN17.080.16
+0.96%
Teucrium Corn Fund
QMMY23.910.02
+0.10%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
IWV359.04-0.29
-0.08%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
MFUS53.54-0.08
-0.15%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor US Eq ETF
IAK128.44-1.52
-1.17%
iShares US Insurance ETF

CNSWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSWF
1D Price
Change %
CNSWF100%
-1.24%
DSGX - CNSWF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
SAP - CNSWF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
MSFT - CNSWF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
PDFS - CNSWF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
PTC - CNSWF
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.43%
More

SAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAP has been closely correlated with SAPGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAP jumps, then SAPGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAP
1D Price
Change %
SAP100%
+1.26%
SAPGF - SAP
76%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
ADSK - SAP
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.99%
NOW - SAP
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.19%
CLSK - SAP
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.55%
CRM - SAP
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
More