COFS
Price
$28.42
Change
+$0.32 (+1.14%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
421.92M
17 days until earnings call
HBNC
Price
$15.88
Change
-$0.07 (-0.44%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
817.21M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COFS vs HBNC

Header iconCOFS vs HBNC Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs HBNCBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$28.42
Change+$0.32 (+1.14%)
Volume$189.91K
Capitalization421.92M
Horizon Ban
Price$15.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.44%)
Volume$306.41K
Capitalization817.21M
COFS vs HBNC Comparison Chart in %
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. HBNC commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Hold and HBNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $28.42 vs. HBNC: $15.88)
Brand notoriety: COFS and HBNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 274% vs. HBNC: 80%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $421.92M vs. HBNC: $817.21M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $421.92M. HBNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $817.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBNC is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBNC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBNC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COFS is a better buy in the short-term than HBNC.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while HBNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($817M) has a higher market cap than COFS($422M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than HBNC: COFS (17.45) vs HBNC (13.63). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 2.773 vs. COFS (-17.938). COFS has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. HBNC (102M). COFS has less debt than HBNC: COFS (247M) vs HBNC (1.09B). HBNC has higher revenues than COFS: HBNC (213M) vs COFS (124M).
COFSHBNCCOFS / HBNC
Capitalization422M817M52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.9382.773-647%
P/E Ratio17.4513.63128%
Revenue124M213M58%
Total Cash155M102M152%
Total Debt247M1.09B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs HBNC: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
HBNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7362
SMR RATING
1..100
5332
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBNC's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (57) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (73) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (53) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (61) in the null industry. This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBNC (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew significantly faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSHBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIGNX35.670.27
+0.76%
Invesco International Growth R
ENHCX10.300.06
+0.59%
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income C
TFOAX82.58-0.03
-0.04%
Touchstone Focused A
VCNIX26.81-0.11
-0.41%
VALIC Company I NASDAQ-100 Index
ADCYX26.80-0.11
-0.41%
American Century Disciplined Growth Y

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been closely correlated with COLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then COLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+1.14%
COLB - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
VLY - COFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
HBNC - COFS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
ASB - COFS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
ORRF - COFS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
More