COHN
Price
$8.50
Change
+$0.10 (+1.19%)
Updated
Apr 28, 01:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.79M
TIGR
Price
$8.14
Change
+$0.41 (+5.30%)
Updated
Apr 28, 02:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
533.37M
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COHN vs TIGR

Header iconCOHN vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts COHN vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Cohen & Company
Price$8.50
Change+$0.10 (+1.19%)
Volume$500
Capitalization13.79M
UP Fintech Holding
Price$8.14
Change+$0.41 (+5.30%)
Volume$814
Capitalization533.37M
COHN vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
COHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COHN vs. TIGR commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COHN is a Buy and TIGR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (COHN: $8.40 vs. TIGR: $7.73)
Brand notoriety: COHN and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COHN: 119% vs. TIGR: 58%
Market capitalization -- COHN: $13.79M vs. TIGR: $533.37M
COHN [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $13.79M. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COHN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COHN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TIGR is a better buy in the long-term than COHN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COHN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COHN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COHN is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

COHN (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +21.54% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +16.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +7.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +135.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

COHN is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+7.04% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIGR($533M) has a higher market cap than COHN($13.8M). TIGR has higher P/E ratio than COHN: TIGR (15.40) vs COHN (1.76). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 19.659 vs. COHN (-16.628). TIGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 69.1M vs. COHN (23M). TIGR has more cash in the bank: 678M vs. COHN (98.7M). COHN has less debt than TIGR: COHN (149M) vs TIGR (166M). TIGR has higher revenues than COHN: TIGR (252M) vs COHN (83M).
COHNTIGRCOHN / TIGR
Capitalization13.8M533M3%
EBITDA23M69.1M33%
Gain YTD-16.62819.659-85%
P/E Ratio1.7615.4011%
Revenue83M252M33%
Total Cash98.7M678M15%
Total Debt149M166M90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COHN vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
COHN
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
168
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7482
SMR RATING
1..100
9181
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COHN's Valuation (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TIGR (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

COHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as TIGR (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that COHN’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's SMR Rating (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as COHN (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to COHN’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as COHN (54) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to COHN’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COHN (88) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than COHN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COHNTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGWRX62.460.95
+1.54%
Columbia Large Cap Growth R
MAIJX17.510.03
+0.17%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq R6
WSCRX30.39-0.08
-0.26%
Allspring Small Company Growth R6
MRJAX10.63-0.03
-0.28%
Morgan Stanley Multi-Asset Real Return A
FEVIX21.58-0.07
-0.32%
First Eagle US I

COHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COHN and NDAQ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COHN and NDAQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COHN
1D Price
Change %
COHN100%
+7.01%
NDAQ - COHN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
XP - COHN
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
CIFR - COHN
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
TIGR - COHN
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
SNEX - COHN
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
+1.84%
FUTU - TIGR
72%
Closely correlated
-6.43%
HKXCY - TIGR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
HKXCF - TIGR
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
IREN - TIGR
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
IBKR - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More