Advertisement
IBKR vs TIGR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) vs. UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- IBKR, a leading global electronic broker, has delivered strong year-to-date returns amid elevated market volatility and record client account growth.
- TIGR, operator of the Tiger Brokers platform focused on international investors, has shown volatility tied to regulatory developments in China and reports upcoming first-quarter results.
- IBKR benefits from diversified revenue streams including commissions, net interest income, and execution services across global markets.
- TIGR has reported robust revenue expansion in prior periods but faces greater exposure to cross-border trading regulations affecting Chinese clients.
- Recent performance shows IBKR outperforming broader market benchmarks with greater stability compared to TIGR’s sharper swings.
- Sector exposure differs markedly, with IBKR positioned as a mature brokerage leader and TIGR as a growth-oriented player in emerging-market retail trading.
Introduction
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) and UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) represent two distinct approaches within the online brokerage sector. IBKR operates as a comprehensive global electronic broker serving retail, institutional, and professional clients worldwide. TIGR, through its Tiger Brokers platform, targets international investors with a focus on Asian markets and cross-border trading. This comparison appeals to traders and investors seeking to evaluate relative performance, business model resilience, and positioning in a market environment characterized by volatility and evolving regulations. The analysis highlights observable differences in scale, growth drivers, and recent momentum without offering investment recommendations.
IBKR Overview and Recent Performance
Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR) provides automated global trading services across equities, options, futures, forex, bonds, and mutual funds. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited resilience supported by increased trading activity amid market uncertainty. Client accounts grew substantially in the prior year, contributing to higher commission revenues and execution statistics. First-quarter results reflected year-over-year gains in net revenues and commissions, though the stock experienced some post-earnings movement typical of earnings seasons. Sentiment has remained constructive due to the firm’s cost-efficient platform and broad market access, with performance outpacing the S&P 500 on a trailing basis in multiple periods. Regulatory tailwinds and product expansions, such as enhanced interfaces for prediction markets, have further supported positioning.
TIGR Overview and Recent Performance
UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) operates Tiger Brokers, an online brokerage emphasizing global equities, options, and futures for retail investors, particularly those interested in cross-border opportunities. Recent market activity has reflected volatility linked to regulatory announcements concerning cross-border securities activities in China. The stock has traded in a range influenced by these developments and broader sentiment toward fintech platforms. Strong full-year 2025 revenue and profit growth provided a foundation, yet the shares have shown sensitivity to headline news. The company is scheduled to report first-quarter 2026 financial results on June 2, 2026, which may provide additional clarity on quarterly trends. Performance metrics indicate outperformance versus certain benchmarks on a year-to-date basis, though longer-term comparisons show more variability relative to larger peers.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating consistent results and suitability for current environments are featured in the trending section. Available bots span multiple styles including momentum, mean-reversion, and trend-following approaches, with differing win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequencies. This curated view allows users to explore data-driven options that align with specific objectives. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and configurations.
Head-to-Head Comparison
IBKR maintains a larger scale with diversified global operations and stable revenue from commissions, net interest income, and other services, whereas TIGR operates with a narrower focus on retail cross-border trading and has historically delivered higher percentage growth during favorable periods. Recent momentum favors IBKR due to consistent account expansion and lower sensitivity to single-market regulatory shifts. TIGR’s performance has been more variable amid China-related policy developments affecting client onboarding and trading flows. Risk factors for IBKR center on interest-rate sensitivity and competition, while TIGR contends with greater regulatory and geopolitical exposure. Sector positioning places IBKR as an established leader in institutional-grade brokerage and TIGR as a nimbler participant in emerging-market retail brokerage. Market sentiment reflects broader confidence in IBKR’s execution quality alongside cautious monitoring of TIGR’s upcoming earnings and regulatory environment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue stability, and relative positioning amid recent volatility, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to IBKR. The larger broker’s diversified model and sustained client growth provide a more consistent profile compared to TIGR’s elevated sensitivity to regulatory headlines. This assessment draws from historical patterns in performance data and sector dynamics rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBKR is a StrongBuy and TIGR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBKR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IBKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBKR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IBKR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TIGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +7.13% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
TIGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.39% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| IBKR | TIGR | IBKR / TIGR | |
| Capitalization | 38.8B | 835M | 4,647% |
| EBITDA | 9.42B | 272M | 3,463% |
| Gain YTD | 35.813 | -51.151 | -70% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.41 | 7.59 | 493% |
| Revenue | 10.6B | 561M | 1,889% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 687M | - |
| Total Debt | 12M | 173M | 7% |
IBKR | TIGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TIGR's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (94). This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (100). This means that IBKR’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
TIGR's SMR Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (45). This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (89). This means that IBKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (96). This means that IBKR’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.
| IBKR | TIGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 52% | 13 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
IBKR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | -1.76% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 67% Closely correlated | -6.02% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| GS - IBKR | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| SCHW - IBKR | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||
TIGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TIGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIGR | 100% | -6.04% | ||
| FUTU - TIGR | 79% Closely correlated | -5.54% | ||
| IBKR - TIGR | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| HOOD - TIGR | 35% Loosely correlated | -6.02% | ||
| XP - TIGR | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| HUT - TIGR | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
More | ||||