COKE
Price
$1382.86
Change
-$59.79 (-4.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.85B
80 days until earnings call
FIZZ
Price
$40.68
Change
+$1.46 (+3.72%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.62B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COKE vs FIZZ

Header iconCOKE vs FIZZ Comparison
Open Charts COKE vs FIZZBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola Consolidated
Price$1382.86
Change-$59.79 (-4.14%)
Volume$67.69K
Capitalization7.85B
National Beverage
Price$40.68
Change+$1.46 (+3.72%)
Volume$363.03K
Capitalization4.62B
COKE vs FIZZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
COKE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COKE vs. FIZZ commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COKE is a Hold and FIZZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (COKE: $1382.86 vs. FIZZ: $40.68)
Brand notoriety: COKE and FIZZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COKE: 175% vs. FIZZ: 210%
Market capitalization -- COKE: $7.85B vs. FIZZ: $4.62B
COKE [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $7.85B. FIZZ’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $4.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $22.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFIZZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COKE is a better buy in the long-term than FIZZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COKE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIZZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COKE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FIZZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FIZZ is a better buy in the short-term than COKE.

Price Growth

COKE (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

COKE is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Jun 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.51% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COKE($7.86B) has a higher market cap than FIZZ($4.63B). FIZZ has higher P/E ratio than COKE: FIZZ (27.31) vs COKE (19.27). COKE YTD gains are higher at: 9.960 vs. FIZZ (-4.664). COKE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 899M vs. FIZZ (248M). COKE has more cash in the bank: 635M vs. FIZZ (277M). FIZZ has less debt than COKE: FIZZ (58.2M) vs COKE (735M). COKE has higher revenues than FIZZ: COKE (6.65B) vs FIZZ (1.18B).
COKEFIZZCOKE / FIZZ
Capitalization7.86B4.63B170%
EBITDA899M248M363%
Gain YTD9.960-4.664-214%
P/E Ratio19.2727.3171%
Revenue6.65B1.18B563%
Total Cash635M277M229%
Total Debt735M58.2M1,263%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COKE vs FIZZ: Fundamental Ratings
COKE
FIZZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
256
SMR RATING
1..100
2622
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4180
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COKE's Valuation (58) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (93). This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (56). This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

FIZZ's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as COKE (26). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to COKE’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (80). This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

COKE's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (84). This means that COKE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COKEFIZZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COKE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVND32.66N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
PTEC36.51N/A
N/A
Global X PropTech ETF
PXF51.33-0.38
-0.73%
Invesco FTSE RAFI Dev Mkts ex-US ETF
DBJP73.91-0.96
-1.28%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
FLKR19.62-0.29
-1.46%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

FIZZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIZZ and PEP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIZZ and PEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIZZ
1D Price
Change %
FIZZ100%
+3.72%
PEP - FIZZ
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
MNST - FIZZ
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.50%
CELH - FIZZ
21%
Poorly correlated
+27.77%
COCO - FIZZ
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
COKE - FIZZ
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
More