Advertisement
FIZZ vs MNST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and MNST is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -5.33% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -6.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -2.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-2.98% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| FIZZ | MNST | FIZZ / MNST | |
| Capitalization | 2.86B | 91.5B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 253M | 2.71B | 9% |
| Gain YTD | 5.913 | 22.029 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.58 | 45.20 | 34% |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 8.79B | 13% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 2.99B | - |
| Total Debt | 62.7M | 199M | 32% |
FIZZ | MNST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 11 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIZZ's Valuation (73) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (87). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (29) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (36). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (58). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (84). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SBU | 21.17 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | |||
| AUGP | 33.23 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug | |||
| SCYB | 25.95 | -0.06 | -0.23% |
| Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | |||
| HIO | 3.57 | -0.05 | -1.38% |
| Western Asset High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
| ONLN | 54.68 | -1.69 | -3.00% |
| ProShares Online Retail ETF | |||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| COKE - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
| CELH - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.57% | ||
| CCEP - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -2.21% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.75% | ||
| FIZZ - MNST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| COKE - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
More | ||||