FIZZ
Price
$36.95
Change
-$0.16 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.46B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNST
Price
$92.02
Change
+$0.81 (+0.89%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.01B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIZZ vs MNST

Header iconFIZZ vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts FIZZ vs MNSTBanner chart's image
FIZZ vs MNST Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIZZ vs. MNST commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Buy and MNST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 12, 2026
Stock price -- (FIZZ: $36.95 vs. MNST: $91.21)
Brand notoriety: FIZZ and MNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIZZ: 121% vs. MNST: 126%
Market capitalization -- FIZZ: $3.46B vs. MNST: $89.2B
FIZZ [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $3.46B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $89.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $355.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $49.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than FIZZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIZZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than FIZZ.

Price Growth

FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +6.39% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.68% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($90B) has a higher market cap than FIZZ($3.46B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than FIZZ: MNST (44.46) vs FIZZ (18.48). MNST YTD gains are higher at: 20.034 vs. FIZZ (15.867). MNST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. FIZZ (260M). MNST has more cash in the bank: 2.99B vs. FIZZ (314M). FIZZ has less debt than MNST: FIZZ (62.7M) vs MNST (199M). MNST has higher revenues than FIZZ: MNST (8.79B) vs FIZZ (1.2B).
FIZZMNSTFIZZ / MNST
Capitalization3.46B90B4%
EBITDA260M2.71B10%
Gain YTD15.86720.03479%
P/E Ratio18.4844.4642%
Revenue1.2B8.79B14%
Total Cash314M2.99B11%
Total Debt62.7M199M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIZZ vs MNST: Fundamental Ratings
FIZZ
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7840
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
2536
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5118
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7144
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIZZ's Valuation (77) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (88). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

FIZZ's SMR Rating (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (36). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (51). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (71). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIZZMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIZZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMRA21.431.28
+6.35%
Damora Therapeutics Inc.
IMRX4.110.19
+4.85%
Immuneering Corp
FTNT145.066.18
+4.45%
Fortinet
TRSG1.640.03
+1.86%
Tungray Technologies
MUR38.49-1.35
-3.39%
Murphy Oil Corp

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.90%
CCEP - MNST
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
KO - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
PEP - MNST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
FIZZ - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
KDP - MNST
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More