CON
Price
$35.00
Change
+$0.19 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GRDN
Price
$37.93
Change
+$0.45 (+1.20%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs GRDN

CON vs GRDN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CON vs. GRDN commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Hold and GRDN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CON: $35.00 vs. GRDN: $37.93)
Brand notoriety: CON and GRDN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 86% vs. GRDN: 97%
Market capitalization -- CON: $4.46B vs. GRDN: $2.4B
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $4.46B. GRDN’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $92.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGRDN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GRDN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than GRDN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRDN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRDN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the short-term than GRDN.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while GRDN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

GRDN is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.28% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($4.46B) has a higher market cap than GRDN($2.4B). GRDN has higher P/E ratio than CON: GRDN (36.47) vs CON (22.58). CON YTD gains are higher at: 79.092 vs. GRDN (26.055). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 455M vs. GRDN (102M). GRDN has more cash in the bank: 64.9M vs. CON (61.7M). GRDN has less debt than CON: GRDN (36.9M) vs CON (2.12B). CON has higher revenues than GRDN: CON (2.29B) vs GRDN (1.46B).
CONGRDNCON / GRDN
Capitalization4.46B2.4B186%
EBITDA455M102M446%
Gain YTD79.09226.055304%
P/E Ratio22.5836.4762%
Revenue2.29B1.46B157%
Total Cash61.7M64.9M95%
Total Debt2.12B36.9M5,753%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONGRDN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GRDN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTGL10.770.16
+1.55%
OTG Latin America ETF
IDYN31.070.35
+1.14%
iShares Intl Eq Fac Rotation Act ETF
AALG18.02N/A
N/A
Leverage Shares 2X Long Aal Daily ETF
FLDR50.10-0.03
-0.06%
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
IBCA25.00-0.02
-0.08%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
+0.55%
PNTG - CON
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
HCSG - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
ARDT - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.87%
UHS - CON
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
HCA - CON
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.64%
More

GRDN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRDN and DCGO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRDN and DCGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRDN
1D Price
Change %
GRDN100%
+1.20%
DCGO - GRDN
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
HCSG - GRDN
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
NHC - GRDN
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
CON - GRDN
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
PNTG - GRDN
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More