CON
Price
$28.79
Change
+$0.30 (+1.05%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.65B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCA
Price
$387.90
Change
+$10.91 (+2.89%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
83.63B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs HCA

CON vs HCA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) vs. HCA Healthcare (HCA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON), a leader in occupational health services, has shown stable performance in recent weeks, trading around $23 with a market cap of approximately $3 billion.
  • HCA Healthcare, a major acute care hospital operator, experienced a post-earnings pullback amid concerns over patient volumes, with shares near $432 and a market cap exceeding $96 billion.
  • HCA trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 15.25 compared to CON's 17.55, indicating potentially better relative valuation.
  • Both stocks operate in the medical care facilities industry, but CON focuses on occupational health while HCA provides broader hospital services.
  • Analyst price targets suggest upside potential for both, with CON at $30 and HCA around $600.
  • Tickeron's AI tools currently favor HCA as a stronger short-term opportunity based on relative momentum.

Introduction

In the competitive healthcare sector, investors and traders often compare specialized providers like Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) with broad-based operators such as HCA Healthcare (HCA). This stock comparison highlights their business models, recent market positioning, and performance drivers amid evolving sector dynamics. Day traders seeking momentum plays, swing traders eyeing relative strength, and long-term investors assessing growth potential in medical care facilities will find value in understanding contrasts in stability, valuation, and catalysts. With healthcare facing volume pressures and cost challenges, evaluating CON vs. HCA offers insights into niche resilience versus scale advantages.

CON Overview and Recent Performance

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) is a leading provider of occupational health services in the United States, operating through segments focused on urgent care, physical therapy, and workers' compensation-related care. The company serves employers and insurers with an extensive network of centers. In recent market activity, CON shares have traded steadily in the low-to-mid $20s, reflecting resilience amid broader healthcare volatility. This stability stems from consistent demand for occupational services, less tied to acute patient admissions. Key metrics include a trailing twelve-month (TTM) earnings per share (EPS) of $1.30, P/E ratio of 17.55, and revenue of $2.16 billion. Sentiment remains supported by analyst buy ratings and a $30 price target, positioning it favorably within its 52-week range of $18.55 to $24.68.

HCA Overview and Recent Performance

HCA Healthcare (HCA) operates one of the largest networks of hospitals and surgical centers in the U.S., delivering comprehensive acute care services including emergency, inpatient, and outpatient treatments. Recent quarters have shown revenue growth, with Q1 2026 sales reaching $19.11 billion, up from prior periods. However, in recent weeks, shares pulled back sharply to around $432 following mixed quarterly results—EPS of $8.01 beat estimates, but weaker respiratory admissions and rising expenses raised volume concerns. TTM EPS stands at $28.35 with a P/E of 15.25 and revenue of $75.6 billion. Trading within a 52-week range of $321 to $556, HCA's performance reflects sector headwinds like utilization softness, tempered by its scale and operational efficiencies driving positive sentiment shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies, including trend-following, dip-buying, swing trading, and leveraged ETF plays, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 170%, win rates of 48% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Examples feature semiconductor groups yielding 60-100% returns and multi-ticker portfolios in aerospace/defense or gold miners at 50-115%. Virtual agents incorporate technical/fundamental analysis and risk corridors like take-profit (TP) 2-3%/stop-loss (SL) 2-10%. Traders can explore these high-performing bots tailored to volatile environments for potential edge in stock trading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) and HCA Healthcare (HCA) both anchor the medical care facilities space but diverge in business models: CON's niche focus on occupational health offers defensive qualities with steady employer-driven demand, while HCA's hospital empire captures broader acute care growth yet exposes it to admissions cyclicality. Recent momentum favors CON's steadiness over HCA's earnings volatility. Valuation trade-offs show HCA's lower P/E and massive scale versus CON's higher growth potential in specialized services. Risk factors include labor costs for both, but HCA faces greater reimbursement pressures; market sentiment tilts toward HCA for diversification despite near-term dips.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI analysis currently leans toward HCA Healthcare as the preferred pick in the short term, driven by superior relative momentum, lower valuation multiples, and stronger positioning despite recent pullbacks. CON exhibits trend consistency in its niche, but HCA's scale and catalysts like revenue expansion provide probabilistic edge amid healthcare recovery signals.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CON vs. HCA commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Buy and HCA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CON: $28.49 vs. HCA: $376.99)
Brand notoriety: CON and HCA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 76% vs. HCA: 102%
Market capitalization -- CON: $3.65B vs. HCA: $83.63B
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $3.65B. HCA’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $83.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $83.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HCA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than HCA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HCA is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while HCA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

HCA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.10% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCA($83.6B) has a higher market cap than CON($3.65B). CON has higher P/E ratio than HCA: CON (20.50) vs HCA (12.99). CON YTD gains are higher at: 45.519 vs. HCA (-18.968). HCA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.7B vs. CON (428M). CON has less debt than HCA: CON (2.12B) vs HCA (49.8B). HCA has higher revenues than CON: HCA (76.4B) vs CON (2.23B).
CONHCACON / HCA
Capitalization3.65B83.6B4%
EBITDA428M15.7B3%
Gain YTD45.519-18.968-240%
P/E Ratio20.5012.99158%
Revenue2.23B76.4B3%
Total Cash61.7MN/A-
Total Debt2.12B49.8B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCA: Fundamental Ratings
HCA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONHCA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUU1231.65151.57
+14.03%
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
REET27.320.26
+0.96%
iShares Global REIT ETF
DWAW51.920.45
+0.87%
AdvisorShares DW FSM All Cap World ETF
CBTL17.710.10
+0.56%
Calamos Ladrd Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF
PDBA35.530.01
+0.03%
Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
-0.25%
PNTG - CON
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
NHC - CON
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ARDT - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
HCA - CON
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
HCSG - CON
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
More

HCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been closely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCA
1D Price
Change %
HCA100%
+0.49%
UHS - HCA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
THC - HCA
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
ENSG - HCA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
CON - HCA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
DVA - HCA
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
More