CON
Price
$28.79
Change
+$0.30 (+1.05%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.65B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LFST
Price
$9.44
Change
+$0.24 (+2.61%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.51B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs LFST

CON vs LFST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CON vs. LFST commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Buy and LFST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CON: $28.49 vs. LFST: $9.20)
Brand notoriety: CON and LFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 76% vs. LFST: 95%
Market capitalization -- CON: $3.65B vs. LFST: $3.51B
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $3.65B. LFST’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $3.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $83.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than LFST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LFST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFST is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while LFST (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +7.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

LFST is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.10% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($3.65B) and LFST($3.51B) have the same market capitalization . LFST has higher P/E ratio than CON: LFST (153.33) vs CON (20.50). CON YTD gains are higher at: 45.519 vs. LFST (30.682). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 428M vs. LFST (98.3M). LFST has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. CON (61.7M). LFST has less debt than CON: LFST (459M) vs CON (2.12B). CON has higher revenues than LFST: CON (2.23B) vs LFST (1.5B).
CONLFSTCON / LFST
Capitalization3.65B3.51B104%
EBITDA428M98.3M435%
Gain YTD45.51930.682148%
P/E Ratio20.50153.3313%
Revenue2.23B1.5B149%
Total Cash61.7M195M32%
Total Debt2.12B459M463%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONLFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DCRE51.68-0.01
-0.02%
DoubleLine Commercial Real Estt Dbt ETF
SMBS25.32-0.06
-0.24%
Schwab® Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
BBHM11.72-0.04
-0.34%
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF
EDV64.81-0.79
-1.20%
Vanguard Extended Duration Trs ETF
BABX16.63-0.69
-3.98%
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with PNTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then PNTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
-0.25%
PNTG - CON
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
NHC - CON
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
ARDT - CON
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
HCA - CON
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
HCSG - CON
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
More