CON
Price
$20.58
Change
-$0.09 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
34 days until earnings call
NAKA
Price
$1.26
Change
+$0.09 (+7.69%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
473.91M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CON vs NAKA

Header iconCON vs NAKA Comparison
Open Charts CON vs NAKABanner chart's image
Concentra Group Holdings Parent
Price$20.58
Change-$0.09 (-0.44%)
Volume$859.03K
Capitalization2.64B
Kindly MD
Price$1.26
Change+$0.09 (+7.69%)
Volume$48.73M
Capitalization473.91M
CON vs NAKA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CON vs. NAKA commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CON is a Buy and NAKA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CON: $20.58 vs. NAKA: $1.26)
Brand notoriety: CON and NAKA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CON: 86% vs. NAKA: 441%
Market capitalization -- CON: $2.64B vs. NAKA: $473.91M
CON [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $2.64B. NAKA’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $473.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $97.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CON’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAKA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAKA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CON is a better buy in the long-term than NAKA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAKA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NAKA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAKA is a better buy in the short-term than CON.

Price Growth

CON (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while NAKA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -15.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +104.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +100.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CON is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

NAKA is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+2.41% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CON($2.64B) has a higher market cap than NAKA($474M). CON YTD gains are higher at: 4.927 vs. NAKA (1.613). CON has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 381M vs. NAKA (-5.19M). CON has more cash in the bank: 73.9M vs. NAKA (6.03M). NAKA has less debt than CON: NAKA (559K) vs CON (2.18B). CON has higher revenues than NAKA: CON (2.01B) vs NAKA (2.24M).
CONNAKACON / NAKA
Capitalization2.64B474M557%
EBITDA381M-5.19M-7,337%
Gain YTD4.9271.613305%
P/E Ratio15.65N/A-
Revenue2.01B2.24M89,554%
Total Cash73.9M6.03M1,227%
Total Debt2.18B559K389,982%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CONNAKA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSCHX12.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Chemicals
JGRSX13.29N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield R6
ACSMX11.58N/A
N/A
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap
HQIIX21.52N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income I
AVUNX20.77N/A
N/A
Avantis® U.S. Equity G

CON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CON has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CON jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CON
1D Price
Change %
CON100%
-0.44%
UHS - CON
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
HCA - CON
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
USPH - CON
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
THC - CON
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
LFST - CON
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
More

NAKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAKA and CCM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAKA and CCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAKA
1D Price
Change %
NAKA100%
+7.69%
CCM - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.29%
CCEL - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
FMS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
UHS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
CON - NAKA
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More