COO
Price
$76.17
Change
-$0.43 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
14.85B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RMD
Price
$224.46
Change
-$2.28 (-1.01%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
32.38B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COO vs RMD

COO vs RMD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Cooper Companies (COO) vs. ResMed (RMD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • The Cooper Companies (COO) and ResMed (RMD) both operate in the medical devices sector but target distinct areas: vision care and women’s health for COO, and sleep-disordered breathing and respiratory care for RMD.
  • Recent market activity shows COO shares facing steeper declines compared to RMD, with broader pressure noted over the past month amid sector volatility.
  • RMD reported double-digit revenue growth in its most recent fiscal quarter and announced a strategic divestiture to sharpen focus on core operations.
  • COO delivered organic revenue growth in its latest reported quarter but recorded a notable litigation-related charge impacting earnings.
  • Sector exposure differs in growth drivers, with RMD benefiting from ongoing demand in respiratory health solutions and COO tied to vision and surgical products.
  • Relative positioning reflects trade-offs in stability, with RMD showing stronger recent momentum in earnings beats while both face typical healthcare regulatory and competitive risks.

Introduction

Investors and traders evaluating healthcare equities often compare specialized medical device companies to assess relative performance, sector positioning, and resilience in varying market conditions. The Cooper Companies (COO) and ResMed (RMD) represent two such names with focused portfolios in vision care and respiratory health, respectively. This comparison appeals to those seeking insights into how these stocks have navigated recent market activity, including earnings trends and operational developments, to inform portfolio allocation decisions within the broader healthcare space.

COO Overview and Recent Performance

The Cooper Companies (COO) is a global medical device firm with primary operations in vision care products, including contact lenses, as well as women’s health and surgical solutions. In recent market activity, shares have experienced downward pressure, contributing to underperformance relative to broader indices over the past several weeks. The company’s fiscal second quarter results, released in early June 2026, showed revenue of $1.082 billion, reflecting 8% year-over-year growth or 5% on an organic basis. However, GAAP diluted earnings per share turned negative at $(0.40) due in part to a litigation-related charge tied to a prior product recall. Organic growth in core segments provided some support to sentiment, though overall positioning reflected caution amid these one-time factors.

RMD Overview and Recent Performance

ResMed (RMD) develops and markets devices and solutions for sleep-disordered breathing and other respiratory conditions. Recent market activity has been influenced by the company’s fiscal third quarter results from April 2026, which delivered revenue of $1.4 billion, up 11% year-over-year, alongside non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.86 that exceeded consensus estimates. In early July 2026, ResMed announced an agreement to sell its MatrixCare business for $490 million, a move intended to concentrate resources on its primary sleep and respiratory platforms. Stock performance over recent weeks has shown relative resilience compared to some peers, supported by consistent demand and operational execution, though broader sector dynamics have contributed to volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots cover thousands of tickers across diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and risk profiles, with only the most suitable for prevailing conditions featured in the trending list. Available statistics often include ranges for win rates, average returns per trade, and drawdown measures that vary by bot, allowing users to evaluate alignment with specific market environments. The platform emphasizes factual differentiation in strategies rather than uniform outcomes. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for current options.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business models, The Cooper Companies (COO) emphasizes vision correction and women’s health devices with exposure to elective procedures, while ResMed (RMD) centers on chronic respiratory care with recurring revenue elements from masks and accessories. Growth drivers diverge accordingly: COO benefits from contact lens adoption trends, whereas RMD leverages rising awareness of sleep apnea solutions. Recent momentum favors RMD following its earnings beat and divestiture announcement, contrasting with COO’s litigation impact on reported earnings. Risk factors include regulatory scrutiny and competition for both, though RMD’s focus on essential therapies may offer relative stability. Sector exposure places both in healthcare but with limited direct overlap, creating trade-offs in cyclical sensitivity versus steady demand patterns. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with observable differences in price resilience over recent periods.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, operational catalysts like the MatrixCare divestiture, and relative price behavior in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference for ResMed (RMD) in current positioning. Trend consistency and growth metrics appear more supportive for RMD compared to the litigation-influenced results at The Cooper Companies (COO), though both remain subject to broader healthcare dynamics and no outcome is assured.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COO vs. RMD commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COO is a Buy and RMD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (COO: $76.17 vs. RMD: $224.46)
Brand notoriety: COO and RMD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COO: 28% vs. RMD: 78%
Market capitalization -- COO: $14.85B vs. RMD: $32.38B
COO [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $14.85B. RMD’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $32.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $139.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMD is a better buy in the long-term than COO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COO is a better buy in the short-term than RMD.

Price Growth

COO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while RMD (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +5.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

COO is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

RMD is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.26% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMD($32.4B) has a higher market cap than COO($14.9B). COO has higher P/E ratio than RMD: COO (64.55) vs RMD (21.52). RMD YTD gains are higher at: -6.319 vs. COO (-7.064). RMD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.18B vs. COO (890M). RMD has more cash in the bank: 1.66B vs. COO (139M). RMD has less debt than COO: RMD (843M) vs COO (2.46B). RMD has higher revenues than COO: RMD (5.54B) vs COO (4.23B).
COORMDCOO / RMD
Capitalization14.9B32.4B46%
EBITDA890M2.18B41%
Gain YTD-7.064-6.319112%
P/E Ratio64.5521.52300%
Revenue4.23B5.54B76%
Total Cash139M1.66B8%
Total Debt2.46B843M292%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COO vs RMD: Fundamental Ratings
COO
RMD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMD's Valuation (13) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (67). This means that RMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

RMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as COO (100). This means that RMD’s stock grew similarly to COO’s over the last 12 months.

RMD's SMR Rating (39) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COO (89). This means that RMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than COO’s over the last 12 months.

COO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as RMD (49). This means that COO’s stock grew similarly to RMD’s over the last 12 months.

COO's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMD (81). This means that COO’s stock grew significantly faster than RMD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COORMD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RMD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALM15.091.24
+8.95%
Almonty Industries Inc
ROP399.341.84
+0.46%
Roper Technologies
CCBG52.49N/A
N/A
Capital City Bank Group
LFMD3.45-0.01
-0.29%
LifeMD
AIMD1.42-0.02
-1.39%
AINOS Inc

COO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COO has been loosely correlated with BDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COO jumps, then BDX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COO
1D Price
Change %
COO100%
-0.56%
BDX - COO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
A - COO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
MMSI - COO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
DHR - COO
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
ICUI - COO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More

RMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMD has been loosely correlated with COO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMD jumps, then COO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMD
1D Price
Change %
RMD100%
-1.01%
COO - RMD
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
BAX - RMD
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
SOLV - RMD
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
BDX - RMD
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
ISRG - RMD
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
More