COP
Price
$115.83
Change
-$2.11 (-1.79%)
Updated
Aug 5, 02:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
143.69B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUR
Price
$38.38
Change
-$0.35 (-0.90%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COP vs MUR

COP vs MUR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Murphy Oil (MUR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both COP and MUR are exploration and production (E&P) companies in the energy sector, with COP as a larger integrated player and MUR as a smaller independent operator.
  • In recent market activity, both stocks delivered strong year-to-date returns near 29-30%, outperforming the broader S&P 500.
  • COP benefits from scale, diversified global assets, and upcoming second-quarter earnings with expectations of significant year-over-year EPS growth.
  • MUR offers a higher dividend yield and has reported recent operational successes, including appraisal drilling results.
  • Market sentiment for both remains tied to oil price stability, with analysts maintaining generally positive ratings amid upcoming earnings releases in early August 2026.
  • Relative positioning favors COP for stability and MUR for potential yield and growth in a smaller capitalization structure.

Introduction

This comparison examines COP (ConocoPhillips) and MUR (Murphy Oil Corporation), two energy sector stocks focused on oil and natural gas exploration and production. Investors and traders interested in the energy space, particularly those evaluating large-cap stability versus mid-cap opportunities, may find this analysis relevant for assessing relative performance, operational scale, and sector exposure in the current market environment. The review draws on recent market activity, earnings expectations, and broader performance trends to highlight key contrasts without forward-looking speculation.

COP Overview and Recent Performance

ConocoPhillips is one of the world’s largest independent exploration and production companies, with operations spanning multiple continents and a focus on conventional and unconventional resources. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience amid energy sector fluctuations, closing near $120 with year-to-date returns around 29-30% as of late July 2026. Recent market activity reflects positive sentiment driven by upcoming second-quarter earnings scheduled for August 6, where analysts anticipate substantial year-over-year EPS growth. The company maintains a diversified asset base that supports production guidance updates, while analyst coverage remains predominantly favorable with periodic price target adjustments. Broader influences include global energy demand trends and project execution updates.

MUR Overview and Recent Performance

Murphy Oil Corporation is a mid-sized independent exploration and production company with assets primarily in the United States and international locations. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $39-40, delivering year-to-date returns of approximately 29-30% through late July 2026. Performance has been supported by operational milestones, including successful appraisal drilling in offshore Vietnam. The company maintains an upcoming second-quarter earnings release around August 5-6, alongside a dividend yield near 3.4%. Recent sentiment reflects steady analyst attention on its production guidance and reserve position, with the stock demonstrating notable one-year gains relative to broader benchmarks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters, with performance metrics including annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown statistics drawn from forward-testing and live results. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions appear in the trending section. Available data shows bots achieving returns ranging from double-digit annualized figures to over 140% in select simulations, depending on the asset class and timeframe. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles and statistics. Review the curated list at Trending AI Robots for current options.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ConocoPhillips operates at a significantly larger scale with a market capitalization exceeding $140 billion, providing greater diversification across global basins compared to Murphy Oil’s mid-cap profile near $5.5 billion. Growth drivers for COP center on production efficiency and international projects, while MUR emphasizes targeted drilling successes and dividend returns. Recent momentum shows both stocks advancing similarly on a year-to-date basis, though COP exhibits lower beta and more consistent analyst support. Risk factors include commodity price volatility for both, with MUR carrying higher earnings volatility typical of smaller operators. Sector exposure remains concentrated in upstream energy for each, yet COP offers broader geographic reach that may moderate localized disruptions. Market sentiment favors established names like COP for relative stability amid earnings season.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, scale advantages, and earnings visibility, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to COP over MUR. The larger company’s diversified positioning and upcoming earnings catalyst provide a more stable profile in recent market activity, though both remain subject to energy sector dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
COP vs. MUR commentary
Aug 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COP is a Hold and MUR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2026
Stock price -- (COP: $117.94 vs. MUR: $38.38)
Brand notoriety: COP: Notable vs. MUR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COP: 98% vs. MUR: 77%
Market capitalization -- COP: $143.69B vs. MUR: $5.5B
COP [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $143.69B. MUR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $5.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $143.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $9.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COP is a better buy in the long-term than MUR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COP and MUR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COP (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +3.37% price change this week, while MUR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +4.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

COP is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

MUR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.94% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COP($144B) has a higher market cap than MUR($5.5B). MUR has higher P/E ratio than COP: MUR (65.05) vs COP (19.99). COP YTD gains are higher at: 27.915 vs. MUR (25.186). COP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.6B vs. MUR (1.32B). COP has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. MUR (379M). MUR has less debt than COP: MUR (2.3B) vs COP (23.3B). COP has higher revenues than MUR: COP (58.2B) vs MUR (2.75B).
COPMURCOP / MUR
Capitalization144B5.5B2,617%
EBITDA24.6B1.32B1,865%
Gain YTD27.91525.186111%
P/E Ratio19.9965.0531%
Revenue58.2B2.75B2,117%
Total Cash6.36B379M1,679%
Total Debt23.3B2.3B1,013%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COP vs MUR: Fundamental Ratings
COP
MUR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2584
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3461
SMR RATING
1..100
6890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COP's Valuation (60) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MUR (79). This means that COP’s stock grew similarly to MUR’s over the last 12 months.

COP's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MUR (61). This means that COP’s stock grew similarly to MUR’s over the last 12 months.

COP's SMR Rating (68) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MUR (90). This means that COP’s stock grew similarly to MUR’s over the last 12 months.

MUR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as COP (43). This means that MUR’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.

MUR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as COP (13). This means that MUR’s stock grew similarly to COP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPMUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXU87.506.42
+7.92%
MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN
IBGB23.570.18
+0.77%
iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Trsy ETF
SHY81.870.10
+0.12%
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
CLIX60.85N/A
N/A
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
SPFF9.45-0.01
-0.11%
Global X SuperIncome™ Preferred ETF

MUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUR has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUR jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUR
1D Price
Change %
MUR100%
-0.90%
CHRD - MUR
81%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
OVV - MUR
79%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
APA - MUR
79%
Closely correlated
-2.90%
COP - MUR
77%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
TALO - MUR
76%
Closely correlated
-4.03%
More