COPX
Price
$94.42
Change
-$2.03 (-2.10%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
8.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLX
Price
$108.69
Change
-$1.04 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
173.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COPX vs SLX

COPX vs SLX Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) vs. VanEck Steel ETF (SLX)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) offers concentrated exposure to global copper mining companies, while VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) provides broader access to the steel value chain including iron ore producers and steel manufacturers.
  • COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index with approximately 40 holdings and a 0.65% expense ratio, emphasizing thematic copper demand from electrification and renewables.
  • SLX follows the MarketVector Global Steel Index with around 42 holdings and a lower 0.55% expense ratio, capturing both upstream mining and downstream steel production activities.
  • Both ETFs are passive, market-cap-weighted vehicles focused on the materials sector but differ in commodity focus, with COPX more sensitive to copper price dynamics and SLX tied to steel production cycles and infrastructure spending.
  • COPX typically exhibits higher volatility due to its narrower thematic mandate, whereas SLX benefits from greater diversification across iron ore and steel operations.
  • Expense efficiency favors SLX, while COPX provides purer play on copper-specific growth drivers such as electric vehicles and renewable energy infrastructure.

Introduction

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) both target the materials sector but pursue distinct commodity exposures that appeal to investors seeking industrial metal opportunities. COPX delivers targeted access to copper miners, aligning with long-term electrification trends, while SLX encompasses the full steel ecosystem from iron ore extraction to finished steel products. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors navigating commodity cycles, infrastructure demand, and global manufacturing activity. The comparison highlights differences in strategy, cost, and risk profiles relevant to current sector positioning.

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) Overview

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) is a passive thematic ETF that seeks to track the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 40 equities focused on companies engaged in copper exploration, mining, and production. Top holdings typically include BHP Group Ltd, Teck Resources Ltd, Hudbay Minerals Inc, Southern Copper Corp, and First Quantum Minerals Ltd, with the top ten positions representing a significant but diversified share of assets. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on materials, with geographic exposure spanning Canada, Australia, the United States, Chile, and other regions. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. The strategy employs market-cap weighting with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index. COPX provides liquid exposure to copper mining equities through a standard open-end structure listed on NYSE Arca.

VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) Overview

VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) is a passive sector ETF designed to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Steel Index. The fund maintains approximately 42 holdings encompassing iron ore miners, steel producers, fabricators, and related service companies. Leading positions often feature BHP Group Ltd, Rio Tinto plc, Vale SA, Nucor Corp, and Steel Dynamics Inc, with the top ten holdings comprising a substantial portion of the portfolio. Sector weights concentrate in materials, supplemented by modest exposure to energy and industrials. Geographic diversification includes Australia, the United States, Brazil, Japan, and Europe. The expense ratio is 0.55%. The index uses a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with quarterly rebalancing and float adjustments. SLX operates as a standard open-end ETF on NYSE Arca, offering liquidity in the steel industry segment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The materials sector encompasses mining and processing of industrial metals essential for global infrastructure, manufacturing, and energy transition. Copper demand receives structural support from electric vehicle adoption, renewable power generation, and data center expansion, while supply constraints from declining ore grades and permitting delays create potential imbalances. Steel production faces cyclical influences from construction activity, automotive output, and capital expenditure cycles, with iron ore prices serving as a key input driver. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories, Chinese industrial output, and geopolitical trade dynamics affect both commodities. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards add operational considerations for producers in both copper and steel value chains.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has shown sensitivity to copper price movements driven by electrification narratives and supply-side developments, resulting in periods of elevated volatility compared with broader equity benchmarks. VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) has reflected steel demand tied to infrastructure spending and manufacturing recovery, with performance influenced by iron ore trends and regional production shifts. Relative positioning highlights COPX’s higher beta to copper-specific catalysts versus SLX’s broader exposure across the steel supply chain, which can moderate volatility during commodity rotations. Both funds have participated in materials sector movements linked to global growth expectations and commodity price cycles over recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the steel value chain, and solid liquidity profile. The fund’s structural characteristics provide a more balanced risk exposure relative to Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX)’s narrower thematic concentration, while maintaining competitive positioning within the materials sector amid ongoing industrial demand.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COPX vs. SLX commentary
Aug 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COPX is a Buy and SLX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COPX has more net assets: 8.64B vs. SLX (174M). COPX has a higher annual dividend yield than SLX: COPX (31.969) vs SLX (28.082). COPX was incepted earlier than SLX: COPX (16 years) vs SLX (20 years). SLX (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than COPX (0.65). SLX has a higher turnover COPX (21.67) vs COPX (21.67).
COPXSLXCOPX / SLX
Gain YTD31.96928.082114%
Net Assets8.64B174M4,968%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.55118%
Turnover21.67107.0020%
Yield2.451.25196%
Fund Existence16 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COPXSLX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFETX64.74N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson European Focus T
NEMIX29.10-0.02
-0.07%
Neuberger Emerg Mkts Eq I
TRGIX17.03-0.04
-0.23%
Nuveen Core Equity Retire
IYBFX27.23-0.11
-0.40%
Nomura Balanced Fund Class R
HIOIX12.69-0.09
-0.70%
M3Sixty Income and Opportunity Instl

COPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COPX has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COPX jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COPX
1D Price
Change %
COPX100%
-2.10%
BHP - COPX
83%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
WDS - COPX
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
NEXA - COPX
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.96%
TKO - COPX
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
MTAL - COPX
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

SLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLX has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLX jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLX
1D Price
Change %
SLX100%
-0.95%
RIO - SLX
81%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
MT - SLX
80%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
VALE - SLX
73%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
TX - SLX
72%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
CMC - SLX
69%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
More