COST
Price
$935.49
Change
+$5.48 (+0.59%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
412.16B
59 days until earnings call
WMT
Price
$101.86
Change
+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
811.96B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COST vs WMT

Header iconCOST vs WMT Comparison
Open Charts COST vs WMTBanner chart's image
Costco Wholesale
Price$935.49
Change+$5.48 (+0.59%)
Volume$19.36K
Capitalization412.16B
Walmart
Price$101.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Volume$3.46K
Capitalization811.96B
COST vs WMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COST vs. WMT commentary
Oct 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COST is a Buy and WMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2025
Stock price -- (COST: $930.01 vs. WMT: $101.84)
Brand notoriety: COST and WMT are both notable
Both companies represent the Discount Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COST: 132% vs. WMT: 109%
Market capitalization -- COST: $412.16B vs. WMT: $811.96B
COST [@Discount Stores] is valued at $412.16B. WMT’s [@Discount Stores] market capitalization is $811.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Discount Stores] industry ranges from $811.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Discount Stores] industry is $99.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMT is a better buy in the long-term than COST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COST is a better buy in the short-term than WMT.

Price Growth

COST (@Discount Stores) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while WMT (@Discount Stores) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Discount Stores industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

COST is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

WMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Discount Stores (-0.36% weekly)

Companies in the discount stores industry specialize in offering substantial discounts on a vast array of retail products. Some companies in this industry also operate general merchandise warehouse clubs. Products sold at discount stores are typically similar to those of any department store, but the pricing of the goods is generally much lower (and hence the name “discount”). Think Dollar General Corporation, Dollar Tree, Inc. and Five Below, Inc. Many discount stores target low-income households and/or price-sensitive consumers as their potential market. Discount stores’ profitability could hinge on factors like competitive pricing, sufficient locations, healthy revenue per square foot, and effective advertisement. These store operators could have an edge over other retailers during financial crises or recessions, when many consumers could be looking for less expensive alternatives.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMT($812B) has a higher market cap than COST($412B). COST has higher P/E ratio than WMT: COST (51.07) vs WMT (38.43). WMT YTD gains are higher at: 13.565 vs. COST (1.885). WMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 44.6B vs. COST (13.4B). COST has more cash in the bank: 15.3B vs. WMT (9.43B). COST has less debt than WMT: COST (8.17B) vs WMT (65B). WMT has higher revenues than COST: WMT (693B) vs COST (275B).
COSTWMTCOST / WMT
Capitalization412B812B51%
EBITDA13.4B44.6B30%
Gain YTD1.88513.56514%
P/E Ratio51.0738.43133%
Revenue275B693B40%
Total Cash15.3B9.43B162%
Total Debt8.17B65B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COST vs WMT: Fundamental Ratings
COST
WMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
813
SMR RATING
1..100
3239
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5932
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMT's Valuation (92) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (96). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (13). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

COST's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (39). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

WMT's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as COST (59). This means that WMT’s stock grew similarly to COST’s over the last 12 months.

COST's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WMT (60). This means that COST’s stock grew similarly to WMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COSTWMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLT90.621.44
+1.61%
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
PCRB49.670.24
+0.49%
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF
XRMI17.61-0.18
-0.99%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
FCTE25.84-0.30
-1.15%
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF
NRO3.15-0.04
-1.25%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund

WMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMT has been loosely correlated with COST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WMT jumps, then COST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMT
1D Price
Change %
WMT100%
+0.07%
COST - WMT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
OLLI - WMT
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
BJ - WMT
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
TGT - WMT
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.01%
PSMT - WMT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More