COTY
Price
$5.12
Change
+$0.17 (+3.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.64B
25 days until earnings call
LRLCF
Price
$433.40
Change
-$0.44 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
250.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

COTY vs LRLCF

Header iconCOTY vs LRLCF Comparison
Open Charts COTY vs LRLCFBanner chart's image
COTY
Price$5.12
Change+$0.17 (+3.43%)
Volume$6.68M
Capitalization10.64B
L'Oreal
Price$433.40
Change-$0.44 (-0.10%)
Volume$110
Capitalization250.04B
COTY vs LRLCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COTY vs. LRLCF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a StrongBuy and LRLCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (COTY: $5.12 vs. LRLCF: $431.92)
Brand notoriety: COTY and LRLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COTY: 78% vs. LRLCF: 37%
Market capitalization -- COTY: $10.64B vs. LRLCF: $250.04B
COTY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $10.64B. LRLCF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $250.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COTY is a better buy in the long-term than LRLCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COTY’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRLCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COTY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LRLCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COTY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCF.

Price Growth

COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.07% price change this week, while LRLCF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

COTY is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.88% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCF($250B) has a higher market cap than COTY($10.6B). LRLCF has higher P/E ratio than COTY: LRLCF (38.61) vs COTY (33.97). LRLCF YTD gains are higher at: 24.861 vs. COTY (-26.437). LRLCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.22B vs. COTY (1.22B). LRLCF has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. COTY (450M). COTY has less debt than LRLCF: COTY (4.01B) vs LRLCF (5.65B). LRLCF has higher revenues than COTY: LRLCF (38.3B) vs COTY (6.01B).
COTYLRLCFCOTY / LRLCF
Capitalization10.6B250B4%
EBITDA1.22B9.22B13%
Gain YTD-26.43724.861-106%
P/E Ratio33.9738.6188%
Revenue6.01B38.3B16%
Total Cash450M2.64B17%
Total Debt4.01B5.65B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COTY vs LRLCF: Fundamental Ratings
COTY
LRLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9459
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3766
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRLCF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as COTY (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCF’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (94) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as COTY (93) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCF’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as COTY (64) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCF’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as LRLCF (66) in the null industry. This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COTYLRLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNFR0.900.01
+1.12%
Conifer Holdings
ACOG9.970.01
+0.10%
Alpha Cognition Inc
EQR67.37-0.28
-0.41%
Equity Residential
ATHM28.09-0.12
-0.43%
Autohome
NGL4.26-0.07
-1.62%
NGL Energy Partners LP

COTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then EL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COTY
1D Price
Change %
COTY100%
+3.43%
EL - COTY
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.18%
LRLCY - COTY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
EPC - COTY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
SPB - COTY
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
IPAR - COTY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More

LRLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCF has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCF jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCF
1D Price
Change %
LRLCF100%
-0.34%
LRLCY - LRLCF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
COTY - LRLCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
BDRFY - LRLCF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
EL - LRLCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.18%
HENOY - LRLCF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
More