COTY
Price
$4.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.64B
56 days until earnings call
LRLCY
Price
$83.05
Change
-$1.55 (-1.83%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
250.04B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COTY vs LRLCY

Header iconCOTY vs LRLCY Comparison
Open Charts COTY vs LRLCYBanner chart's image
COTY
Price$4.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.57K
Capitalization10.64B
L'Oreal
Price$83.05
Change-$1.55 (-1.83%)
Volume$65.11K
Capitalization250.04B
COTY vs LRLCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COTY vs. LRLCY commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Buy and LRLCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (COTY: $4.64 vs. LRLCY: $83.04)
Brand notoriety: COTY and LRLCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COTY: 77% vs. LRLCY: 78%
Market capitalization -- COTY: $10.64B vs. LRLCY: $250.04B
COTY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $10.64B. LRLCY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $250.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRLCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRLCY is a better buy in the long-term than COTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COTY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRLCY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COTY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COTY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCY.

Price Growth

COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -3.13% price change this week, while LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

COTY is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+3.45% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCY($250B) has a higher market cap than COTY($10.6B). LRLCY has higher P/E ratio than COTY: LRLCY (39.06) vs COTY (33.97). LRLCY YTD gains are higher at: 20.132 vs. COTY (-33.333). LRLCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.22B vs. COTY (1.22B). LRLCY has higher revenues than COTY: LRLCY (38.3B) vs COTY (6.01B).
COTYLRLCYCOTY / LRLCY
Capitalization10.6B250B4%
EBITDA1.22B9.22B13%
Gain YTD-33.33320.132-166%
P/E Ratio33.9739.0687%
Revenue6.01B38.3B16%
Total Cash450MN/A-
Total Debt4.01BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COTY vs LRLCY: Fundamental Ratings
COTY
LRLCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8747
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3577
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRLCY's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (87) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (87) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's SMR Rating (93) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as LRLCY (96) in the null industry. This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that LRLCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRLCY (77) in the null industry. This means that COTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COTYLRLCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESMCX15.92N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV Euro Small Company C
FAASX29.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% A
GTSFX37.65N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
JRSDX11.81N/A
N/A
JH Adaptive Risk Mgd U.S. Eq D
RESGX15.56-0.11
-0.70%
Glenmede Environmental Accountability

COTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then EL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COTY
1D Price
Change %
COTY100%
-1.49%
EL - COTY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
LRLCY - COTY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
EPC - COTY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
IPAR - COTY
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
SPB - COTY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
More

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
-1.83%
BDRFY - LRLCY
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
COTY - LRLCY
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
EL - LRLCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
HENKY - LRLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
More